Re: [Vote] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2, without -all package

+1 (binding) verified signatures, build, and standalone, -Dave On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 1) Notices and licenses look good to me (some minor issues, but not > enough to hold up release) > 2) md5, sha1, sig look good > 3) findbugs, rat and tests pass

Re: Create `release/4.5.2` and `release/4.6.1` labels

Il gio 21 dic 2017, 19:42 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I created `release/4.5.2` and `release/4.6.1` for bug fixes that might need > to go to 4.5 and 4.6. For example, #900 > is a change that I believe > need to go to both branches. > > Not s

Create `release/4.5.2` and `release/4.6.1` labels

Hi all, I created `release/4.5.2` and `release/4.6.1` for bug fixes that might need to go to 4.5 and 4.6. For example, #900 is a change that I believe need to go to both branches. Not sure if we need to have `release/4.5.2` or not. But I am just cre