I support adding back pressure based on client memory limits to the
bookkeeper client.
My biggest concern is how the back pressure is propagated to the
client application. If I am reading the draft implementation
correctly, it is via a blocking operation on the calling thread for
the `BookieClient
+1 - non binding
- checksum and signatures
- built sources on Mac, jdk11
- verified localbookie and shell
- upgraded BK on Apache Pulsar (2.11 snapshot) and verified several
scenario in K8S installation
Thanks!!
BR,
Nicolò Boschi
Il giorno mar 27 set 2022 alle ore 17:41 Enrico Olivelli <
eoliv
Yong,
Il giorno mer 28 set 2022 alle ore 10:23 Yong Zhang
ha scritto:
>
> We have improved the memory issue with backpressure with PR
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3324
>
> The backpressure way can prevent there have too many Add requests
> pending to the client and waiting for the
We have improved the memory issue with backpressure with PR
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3324
The backpressure way can prevent there have too many Add requests
pending to the client and waiting for the response. It makes the add
requests
fail fast, so if the channel is not writable, i
