Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

happen? >> >> If the client is using v3 protocol, but both client and bookie side >> stacktraces show it is using v2 protocol, that means there was a corruption >> causing client and bookie switching from v3 protocol to v2 protocol. >> >> https://github.com/apac

Re: Help with bad errors on 4.6.1

gt; bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/ > proto/BookieProtoEncoding.java#L502 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/master/ > bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/ > proto/BookieProtoEncoding.java#L432 > > > > > > On Thu, M

Re: Meeting Agenda (03/08/2018)

Minutes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-03-08+Meeting+Agenda Most of the discussion was about ByteBufs and refcounts Cheers Enrico 2018-03-07 22:36 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli : > I will attend but unfortunately only for the first 30 minutes > > I

Re: Intro to git worktree

2018-03-08 14:47 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly : > > I didn't know this great feature! > > Thank you I will try out soon. > > I guess as maven uses a shared repo in .m2 you should have several maven > > repos, one for each local work dir but it is only a matter of adding an > > argument on the command lin

Re: Intro to git worktree

you should have several maven repos, one for each local work dir but it is only a matter of adding an argument on the command line > > Cheers, > Ivan > > [1] > https://spin.atomicobject.com/2016/06/26/parallelize-development-git-worktrees/ > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Meeting Agenda (03/08/2018)

elaying 4.7.0 > > release a > > > bit to align it with pulsar 2.0 release, since yahoo merge is done and > > > pulsar switches to use 4.7.0. would like to catch any bugs related > yahoo > > > merges before 4.7.0 release to make sure pulsar smoothly switch to use > > > apache release in its 2.0 release. > > > > > > - Sijie > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Triage process for current open issues

2018-03-07 13:15 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly : > Hi folks, > > We currently have about 150 open issues. Sometimes it feels like stuff > is added an never looked at again. We need to do some > cleanup/categorization, i.e. triage. > > In the past, a triage process which has worked for me is: > - Allocate a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: distributedlog-nightly-build #593

lasses, when those classes change, it will break the > build. > > > > since we already move the DL core to bookkeeper, we can stop the DL > > jenkins jobs. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: distributedlog-nightly-build #593

stributedlog-build-tools-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/distributedlog-build-tools/target/distributedlog-build-tools-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar> > to > org.apache.distributedlog/distributedlog-build-tools/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/distributedlog-build-tools-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.jar > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/distributedlog-build-tools/target/distributedlog-build-tools-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar> > to > org.apache.distributedlog/distributedlog-build-tools/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/distributedlog-build-tools-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/distributedlog-core-twitter/pom.xml> > to > org.apache.distributedlog/distributedlog-core-twitter/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/distributedlog-core-twitter-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/distributedlog-proxy-protocol/pom.xml> > to > org.apache.distributedlog/distributedlog-proxy-protocol/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/distributedlog-proxy-protocol-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/tests/pom.xml> > to > org.apache.distributedlog.tests/tests-parent/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/tests-parent-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/tests/backward-compat-0.4/pom.xml> > to > org.apache.distributedlog.tests/backward-compat-test-0.4/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/backward-compat-test-0.4-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > [JENKINS] Archiving < > https://builds.apache.org/job/distributedlog-nightly-build/ws/distributedlog-proxy-server/pom.xml> > to > org.apache.distributedlog/distributedlog-proxy-server/0.6.0-SNAPSHOT/distributedlog-proxy-server-0.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom > channel stopped > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Pulsar now using standard Apache BookKeeper

; for being very receptive and helpful in getting this load of changes back > > into mainline. > > > > > > Matteo > > -- > > Matteo Merli > > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

We are online ! https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper/ I will create issues in order to increase code coverage for 4.8 Enrico Il mar 27 feb 2018, 18:28 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > > > Il mar 27 feb 2018, 18:17 Aaron Coburn ha scritto: > >> Hello Enrico, >&g

Re: Apache ASF Slack vs BookKeeper Slack

2018-02-28 15:42 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > 2018-02-28 15:25 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Apache ASF Slack vs BookKeeper Slack

2018-02-28 15:25 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:33 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I had a recent discussion on d...@maven.apache.org about Slack channels. > > It seems that there is an "official" Slack place of Apache Projects a

Apache ASF Slack vs BookKeeper Slack

Hi, I had a recent discussion on d...@maven.apache.org about Slack channels. It seems that there is an "official" Slack place of Apache Projects and Olivier Olamy (in copy in this email) suggested to move to the standard ASF channel hosted at the-asf.apache.org. Another topic: I was subscribed to

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

quot; button at the bottom of the page. You should then be able to > re-add the repository with a completely empty history. I don't know if > INFRA would need to be involved, but that's the basic process. > Thank you Aaron Our repo is managed by ASF infra I will take a look Enr

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

01:00 Sijie Guo : > Change lgtm. Merged. You are unblocked for updating the jenkins job. Please > remember deleting the wip jenkins job after you update the jenkins dsl. > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:12 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Patch is ready forto r

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Enrico Olivelli and Jia Zhai join the Apache BookKeeper PMC

wrote: > > On behalf of the Apache BookKeeper PMC I am pleased to announce that > Enrico > > Olivelli and Jia Zhai have accepted our invitation to become a PMC member > > on the Apache BookKeeper project. > > > > Please join me in thanking Enrico and Jia for the

Re: BookKeeper Java Client package

has been inside my mind since I started working on BK. If I won't have time now and/or other guys will be able to sponsor/constribute I will be happy to work on this topic as soon as possible, if not for 4.8 it will be for 4.9. Enrico > > > > Sijie > > > > >

BookKeeper Java Client package

? Thoughts? Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

Patch is ready forto review https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1129 Once all is working okay in master I will submit patch for standard jenkins job Il lun 19 feb 2018, 10:45 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > >

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-02-22)

-21 17:55 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli : > > > Il mer 21 feb 2018, 09:59 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> >> I put up the meeting agenda for this meeting this week. >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ >> 2018-02-22+Meetin

Re: Outdated public project reference on ASF website

DL which will be released together with BK Enrico > > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > Hi I just got into this, we are stuck at 2014, 4.3.0 recommended version! > > > > https://projects.apache.org/project.html?bookkeeper > > &

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-02-22)

discussions. > It looks there are many points! I am mostly interested in PTable I hope I will be able to attend this time Thanks Enrico > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Andrey Yegorov

drey and Sam! Great to see the team growing :D >> >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Enrico Olivelli >> wrote: >> > Congrats Andrey! >> > >> > Enrico >> > >> > >> > Il mar 20 feb 2018, 11:16 Sijie Guo ha scritto: >> >

Re: BP-30: table service as a contrib module in bookkeeper

Il mar 20 feb 2018, 12:05 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Il mar 20 feb 2018, 10:57 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> >> Hope you guys have gone through the BP. >> >> I've also made the repo of this table service that we have been working on >&

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Sam Just

is leading the efforts of pushing > salesforce changes to open source. He has been active in code > contributions, discussions and code reviews. We are looking forward to more > contributions from him. > > Congratulations and welcome onboard, Sam! > > Sijie on behave of t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Andrey Yegorov

to more contributions from him. > > Congratulations and welcome onboard, Andrey! > > Sijie on behave of the BookKeeper PMC > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BP-30: table service as a contrib module in bookkeeper

> > > Sijie > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:01 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri < > > jujj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> A great step to move forward. BP-29 and BP-30 along with reorganizing ZK > >> will help the BK to shape perfect M

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

bs - submit patch for final Jenkins CI jobs using Jenkins DSL Thoughts ? Enrico 2018-02-15 13:47 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > ack > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il mer 14 feb 2018, 23:35 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > > > Well do

Outdated public project reference on ASF website

Hi I just got into this, we are stuck at 2014, 4.3.0 recommended version! https://projects.apache.org/project.html?bookkeeper Anyone knows how to update? Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: “Can one of the admins verity the patch”

2018-02-16 11:43 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > Hi all, > > Any idea why asfgit is updating every PR with this message? Or is anyone > experiementing any CI changes? > No, I was just sending the same email. Can you ask INFRA ? Enrico > > Sijie >

Re: Journal Corruption when disk is full

sometimes some bookie crashed due to lack of disk space but my collegues simply dropped the bookie. Now that bookies turn into read-only mode the problems is mitigated a lot. Sorry Enrico > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

of all upstream projects but actually it is failing. I have some idea but not much time, I am moving on but it will time some other iteration Enrico > - Sijie > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:55 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > I have to clean up the patch but actually code coverag

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

gaps, at least cleaning up the noise. I need to finish the work about classes not tested in the same package then we will be able to draw a roadmap, creating subtask for missing test cases, cleaning up interfaces. Enrico Il dom 11 feb 2018, 17:43 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > Created t

Re: BP-30: table service as a contrib module in bookkeeper

to release it with regular releases of BK ? Thanks Enrico Il mar 13 feb 2018, 00:47 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 6:35 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > (Maybe it is better to comment on google doc but these are very high > level > > questions) >

Re: BP-30: table service as a contrib module in bookkeeper

gt; > > implementation based > > > > on the metadata api contract defined in BP-28. > > > > > > > > BP-29 is to use Etcd as the metadata service, while BP-30 is to have > a > > > > built-in key/value service as the metadata service. Both BP-29 and >

Re: Problem with BookKeeper 4.6.1 on Java 9

Il lun 12 feb 2018, 17:39 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > 2018-02-12 17:15 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Enrico Olivelli > > > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Problem with BookKeeper 4.6.1 on Java 9

2018-02-12 17:15 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > (moving to dev). > > > > I am going to change only BookKeeper and not DL, in order to ccherry pick > > easily the commit, I think we should change DL only

Re: Problem with BookKeeper 4.6.1 on Java 9

2018 at 4:26 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > Self explained, it is a bug in Maven Shade Plugin, need to upgrade to > 3.1.0 > > > > This is the patch > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1144 > > > > I volunteer for releasing 4.6.2, this is a

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

JaCoCo instrumentation, so I will use Apache CI Enrico 2018-02-07 17:24 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli : > > > 2018-02-05 22:33 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Enrico Olivelli >> wrote: >> >> > Il lun 5 feb 2018, 18:11 David Rusek ha

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

2018-02-05 22:33 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il lun 5 feb 2018, 18:11 David Rusek ha scritto: > > > > > It sounds like we didn't do anything with the info for a long time. > > Enrico, >

Re: BP-30: table service as a contrib module in bookkeeper

t as > "preview"/"alpha" in 4.7 and continue the development of this module in > bookkeeper community. > > The details of the proposal can be found in the google doc attached below: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/155xAwWv5IdOitHh1NVMEwCMGgB28M3FyMiQSxEpjE-Y/edit#heading=h.56rbh52koe3f > > Please take a look. Comments are welcome. > > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

that our corpus of tests is very heavy as most of the tests start a new cluster. Recently we started to use mockito in order to perform narrower unit testing. Stay tuned Enrico Enrico > > -Dave > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Will do

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

Will do. Enrico Il lun 5 feb 2018, 17:45 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > Can’t remember exactly whether it is only on BC stuffs. But feel free to > try it. > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:43 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> I think was due to BC tests, we can restore now that we d

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

at 12:27 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Sijie, >> it seems that Coveralls report is a bit outdated. >> Have we have disabled it on CI ? >> >> see >> https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper?branch=master >> >> Enrico >> >> 2017-10

Re: BookKeeper and code-coverage - JaCoco

Sijie, it seems that Coveralls report is a bit outdated. Have we have disabled it on CI ? see https://coveralls.io/github/apache/bookkeeper?branch=master Enrico 2017-10-03 19:55 GMT+02:00 Enrico Olivelli : > Ok, I'll check it out. > > Il mar 3 ott 2017, 19:52 Sijie Guo ha sc

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate FlatLedgerManager

option for my cases so I think my customers will be happy even with a simple tool. Maybe we can have a tool which creates a new structure using a different base path so that is case of failure the cluster is not compromised. Enrico > -Ivan > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [DISCUSS] EOL of BookKeeper releases

2018-02-01 13:29 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > > > We have switched to Time Based Release Schedule > > > > BP-13+-+Time+Based+Release+Plan> > > > since > > > 4.6.0 and we have 3 successful r

Re: [DISCUSS] EOL of BookKeeper releases

e releases as archived, remove them from BC tests, > delete the legacy code that was there for supporting BC with these > releases. > > Thoughts? > Very good +1 Enrico > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BP-26: Move distributedlog library into bookkeeper

et #1024 > >> <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1024> with corresponding > >> sub tasks. > >> > >> - Sijie > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.6.1 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.6.1. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment sto

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.6.1 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version4.6.1. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment stor

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.6.1, release candidate #0

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 5 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: * Sijie Guo (binding) * JV (binding) * Ivan Kelly (binding) * Jia Zhai * Yiming Zang There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! Enrico Olivelli

Re: BP-26: Move distributedlog library into bookkeeper

> sub > > tasks. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 AM, Enrico Olivelli - Diennea < > >> enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote: > >> > >&

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.6.1, release candidate #0

passed a run through Jepsen > > Good work Enrico! And sorry about the delay in voting. > > -Ivan > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:52 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > +1 > > > > - package checksums are good > > - source package is good > > - binary package is go

Re: [DISCUSS] Thoughts on enabling rerunFailedTests in surefire?

ry > > < > http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#rerunFailingTestsCount > > > > > > As part of this, I suggest that we also institute a no submission on > > red policy (i.e. tests have to get full green to be merged). > > > FYI. I created one issue for same purpose before: > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1031 +1 Enrico > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Ivan > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.6.1, release candidate #0

ary package look good. > > - in binary package, bin/bookkeeper and command localbookie runs well. > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version > > 4.6.1, as fo

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-01-25)

s and > mailing-list/slack discussion. > > Please take a look and comment to add the items that I missed and you would > like to bring them in discussion. > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2018-01-25+Meeting+Agenda > > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BP-26: Move distributedlog library into bookkeeper

ail thread ? This is an important change, to me rules are not very clear with the new github BP workflow, I knew on ASF it is important that all votes are done by means of official mailing lists Enrico - Sijie -- Enrico Olivelli Software Development Manager @Diennea Tel.: (+39) 0546 066

[VOTE] Release 4.6.1, release candidate #0

jority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Enrico Olivelli [1] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/980 [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.1-rc/ [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-

Re: BP14 help wanted

is a great step for BookKeeper as a pure storage system Enrico 2018-01-12 22:52 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli : > JV, > currently the project which needs BP-14 has been postponed and my company > plans to resume it at the end of Spring, willing to deliver the first > release during Summer.

Re: Cutting 4.6.1 release

create a nice and useful list. I think Flavio pointed this out several times too Enrico > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > +1, > > From my view, it is better to "have an issue for each PR". > > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Enrico

Re: BookKeeper Durability issues/proposals

issues based on this. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LYZSiJ2x5mXMOjQqMWU7ZBRJD8YVDkB-hRPZ474O7Qw/edit?usp=sharing > > > > -- > Jvrao > --- > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then > you win. - Mahatma Gandhi > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Cutting 4.6.1 release

Some news, I am on hold due to two critical bugs to be fixed. I will resume as soon as we merge the fixes Stay tuned Enrico Il dom 14 gen 2018, 15:24 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > This is the PR for release notes > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/980 > > I would li

Re: Cutting 4.6.1 release

even licensing change is ready, you should stick to > > only release server package. Because 4.6.1 is a bug fix release for > 4.6.0, > > which should be only limited to bug fixes. > > > > Sijie > > > > On Jan 7, 2018 2:35 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote: >

Re: BP14 help wanted

did. > > Thanks, > Sijie > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi BookKeepers, > > During this period I have changed my priorities, I am working on releases > > of other products and actually I will be able to work at full time at

BP14 help wanted

and move forward. I will continue to follow that work, that is very important for Bookkeeper as storage engine. Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-01-11)

>>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > >>> > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > > >>> > We have a community meeting coming up this week. I put up a wiki page > >>> > about the meeting agenda. Please take a look and comment to add the > items > >>> > that I missed. > >>> > > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > >>> > 2018-01-11+Meeting+Agenda > >>> > > >>> > - Sijie > >>> > > >>> > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Meeting Agenda (2018-01-11)

I am sorry too, I cannot attend the meeting this time anyone else will attend ? Enrico 2018-01-10 9:09 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > sorry - I forgot that I will have a conflict meeting at that day, so I > can't attend the meeting this time. > > If anyone can drive the meeting, that would be great! >

Re: Wrong version in branch-4.6

Il lun 8 gen 2018, 01:52 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Il dom 7 gen 2018, 20:38 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > > > Can you file an issue for that? I think maven release plugin should > have > > a

Re: Wrong version in branch-4.6

nfig as well Enrico > > Sijie > > On Jan 7, 2018 6:07 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" wrote: > > Hi, > on branch 4.6 we still have wrong version, it SHOULD be 4.6.1-SNAPSHOT but > actually is 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT, see (1) > I will fix it manually in order to move the 4.6.1 r

Wrong version in branch-4.6

Hi, on branch 4.6 we still have wrong version, it SHOULD be 4.6.1-SNAPSHOT but actually is 4.6.0-SNAPSHOT, see (1) I will fix it manually in order to move the 4.6.1 release forward But we have to fix this in the major release flow, Enrico 1) https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/blob/e52ffb04761

Cutting 4.6.1 release

branch before the release. I will take care of having all of them in. About the licensing stuff...I am going to relase the same set of artifacts as 4.6.0 because we are not ready to distribute the big package with all the dependencies Cheers Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Using Maven Resolver for BC tests

gt; > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > heh, look at what I just pushed to https://github.com/apache/ > bookkeeper/pull/930 > > > > -Ivan > > > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I

Using Maven Resolver for BC tests

Hi, I wrote some lines of code in order to demonstrate my idea for BC tests. The idea is: - use Maven Resolver to download code - create a ClassLoader which loads classes from such downloaded artifacts - use a scripting language, like Groovy (which is loosely typed) to write tests (Groovy is real

Re: [DISCUSS] BP-24: BookieScanner: Enhance Data Integrity

l take a look as soon as I can - Arvin -- Enrico Olivelli Software Development Manager @Diennea Tel.: (+39) 0546 066100 - Int. 925 Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) MagNews - E-mail Marketing Solutions http://www.magnews.it Diennea - Digital Marketing Solutions http://www.dienn

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

4 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > > I’m happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > > > > > There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: > > > > * Enrico Olivelli(no-binding) > > > > * Sijie Guo(binding) > > >

Re: Create `release/4.5.2` and `release/4.6.1` labels

gt; I would like to pick 4.6.1 so that I can consolidate the 'minor releases' procedure Enrico > > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Jenkins CI jobs

gt; I also put up a page about "testing" - > http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/testing/ for documenting this. > > We are also looking for proposals to improve current bookkeeper testing > pipeline to make sure we can deliver high-quality releases. > Great! Thank you Enrico > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [Vote] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2, without -all package

per-4.6.0-rc2/>* > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgap > achebookkeeper-1023/ > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.6.0 > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: commits/cherry-picks to branches

ds to be checked in. > - if you are manually cherry-picking changes from master to branches > (bypass the merge script), please remember to update the corresponding pull > requests and issues with the correct release label. > Got it. I like the merge script > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Yiming Zang

le. He is active in code contributions, discussion > and code reviews. We are looking forward to more contributions from him. > > Congratulations and welcome onboard, Yiming! > > Sijie on behave of the BookKeeper PMC > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

ed from findbugs/spotbugs annotations We can exclude it from the packaging > > -Ivan > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > 2017-12-18 2:00 GMT+01:00 Jia Zhai : > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> Please review and vot

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

2017-12-18 2:00 GMT+01:00 Jia Zhai : > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version > 4.6.0, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > +1 (non binding) Run tests from source package C

Re: Compat Tests for 4.5 and 4.6 and EOL of old releases

2017-12-15 10:19 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo : > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:45 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > we need to address this issue, that is to introduce compat test for 4.5 > and > > 4.6 and possibly drop legacy versions. > > > > This

Compat Tests for 4.5 and 4.6 and EOL of old releases

Hi guys, we need to address this issue, that is to introduce compat test for 4.5 and 4.6 and possibly drop legacy versions. This is very important for us and for our time based release plan. Does anyone have cycles for this ? I have some idea but not enough time to implement the full stack, I w

Re: Switch from Findbugs to Spotbugs

potbugs:check`. > Thank you Sijie > > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #1

2017-12-11 10:51 GMT+01:00 Jia Zhai : > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version > 4.6.0, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) > > The complete staging area is available for your

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #0

> > > > Otherwise everything looks good. > > > > 1. checksums and signature checked out > > > > 2. findbugs, rat, and tests ran cleanly > > > > 3. Jepsen tests passed > > > > > > > > The other thing that's neede

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #0

+1 (non binding) looks good to me - Built and tested candidate source tar ball - Run Bookie and basic Bookie shel commands from the "dist all" package - Checked tag on GitHub - All tests are passing on my downstream projects (some of them need re-compiling or minor changes) Thank you Jia for driv

Re: CI job for release branch

ter` to run CI over > > `branch-4.6`. so we at least have a CI job running for current release > > branch. > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/B/view/BK/job/bookkeeper-release-branch > > > > We need to think about a solution for this and how to manage this. > > > > - Sijie > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Votes on tags vs docker hub requirements

I will send it 2017-11-30 14:29 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly : > PR is enough. People can vote with their reviews. > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > For this kind of changes do we need a vote ? or is it enough a PR against > > the releas

Re: Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-11-30

There are interesting topics in these days: - new BP process based on the website, without Wiki (Sijie) - new client API, still unstable, needed for DL ? defer 4.6 release (I hope not) ? - discussion about seal/clos... (Sijie/Ivan) - Salesforce findings on allocations (JV?) - Checkstyle status (Si

Re: Votes on tags vs docker hub requirements

r to change the docker image process, leaving tag > >> > untouched. I have raised the discussion about official docker image > ago. > >> > That was for addressing the issues I have seen in docker image > >> generation. > >> > I think we should revisit

Votes on tags vs docker hub requirements

...) I am not a lawyer I just want to understand what I am doing and improve things. Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.5.1 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.5.1. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment sto

BookKeeper 4.5.1 released!

improve stability. Thank you all! Enrico -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: BP and documentation

Il mer 22 nov 2017, 10:44 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > We could try with the next BP > > Maybe we'd better do the the migration of existing docs only after seeing > > that the approach is feasible. &

Re: BP and documentation

We could try with the next BP Maybe we'd better do the the migration of existing docs only after seeing that the approach is feasible. My major concern is about non-committers. Anyway who proposes a BP will likely be the lead for the implementation, if he is not a committer he would be somehow skil

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 4.5.1, release candidate #1

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: * Sijie Guo * Ivan Kelly * Dave Rusek * Jia Zhai (non binding) There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! Enrico Olivelli

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >