sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-319171603
@jiazhai @caiok what is going to be reused here? as we discussed, we need to
keep only one version. I am wondering why not just
sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-318753769
@caiok @jiazhai as we discussed in the community meeting, do you guys want
to work together to move this forward?
sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-318436548
notes about the docker image from today's meeting
- follow what other apache projects are doing
sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-317831799
@caiok
Let me try to summarize here. There are two approaches:
1. the approach suggested in this pull request. a
sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-317770478
@caiok : regarding the versioning here, I am not sure whether we need to
keep the version here. Ideally the docker image should
sijie commented on issue #197: BOOKKEEPER-974: Add an official bookkeeper
docker image
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/197#issuecomment-311800374
@caiok any updates on this pull request?
This is an automated
