Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-11-08 Thread Enrico Olivelli
Matteo, we never updated the website for this release Enrico Il giorno mar 1 giu 2021 alle ore 01:34 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > The vote is now closed and the release was approved with 6 +1s (4 > binding and 2 non-binding); > > Binding votes: > * Matteo > * Jia > * Sijie > * Enrico > > Non-

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-31 Thread Matteo Merli
The vote is now closed and the release was approved with 6 +1s (4 binding and 2 non-binding); Binding votes: * Matteo * Jia * Sijie * Enrico Non-Binding votes: * Yong * Hang Thank you. Matteo -- Matteo Merli On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:47 AM hangc wrote: > > +1(non-binding) > > * gi

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-31 Thread hangc
+1(non-binding) * git clone source code and checkout tag release-4.14.1-rc0 * mvn install to localhost * change pulsar’s bookkeeper dependency to 4.14.1 in pom.xml * mvn package pulsar source code * deploy pulsar lib on BIGO pulsar test cluster * produce to and consume fro

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-31 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) - built from sources - run smoke tests on binary artifacts, activating Prometheus provider - tested with BookKeeper Visual Manager I came into this bug, it is not a regression, but I had never noticed before https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2725 basically on my machine bin

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-30 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 Verified the followings: - checksum, signatures - source package can build - binary package can run - Sijie On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:34 PM Matteo Merli wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version > 4.14.1, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-30 Thread Yong Zhang
+1 (non-binding) - verified binary packages checksum and signature - run the server package in standalone mode. `bin/bookkeeper shell simpletest -ensemble 1 -writeQuorum 1 -ackQuorum 1` runs well. Thanks, Yong On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:57, Jia Zhai wrote: > +1 > > - verified packages checksum

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-30 Thread Jia Zhai
+1 - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all) and the target that builds from src package, 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Sat,

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-30 Thread PengHui Li
+1 (non-binding) * Download binary package * Change the stats provider to org.apache.bookkeeper.stats.prometheus.PrometheusMetricsProvider * Running standalone bookie * Check localhost:8080/metrics to check the metrics * All metrics looks good. Thanks, Penghui On 2021/05/29 05:34:19,

[VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

2021-05-28 Thread Matteo Merli
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.14.1, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The o