Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Aled Sage
Hi Geoff, all, For using vagrant, Iuliana said:     "Successfully started unpacked and started apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3-vagrant.zip. All nodes were correctly created." Geoff, did your steps match the vagrant instructions at http://brooklyn.apache.org/v/latest/start/running.html? *Iuliana*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Geoff Macartney
My current appraisal of the RC is: verify_brooklyn_rc.sh looks ok, tail of output (tidied): [✓] Build from sources successful ~/brooklyn_releases/apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3 ~/brooklyn_releases --- Additional steps requiring manual intervention (execute in

[GitHub] [brooklyn] kemitix commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
kemitix commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/pull/44#issuecomment-589262910 @geomacy I think we want to be going forward, and using the updated maven 3.6.3 image, which this PR allows. The PR to roll-back to maven 3.5.4 by @tbouron was added

[GitHub] [brooklyn] geomacy edited a comment on issue #44: Don't install openjdk

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
geomacy edited a comment on issue #44: Don't install openjdk URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/pull/44#issuecomment-589242354 > Hi Geoff, I believe this is an alternative solution to the problem @tbouron was fixing. Applying both would result in openjdk not being available. Paul >

[GitHub] [brooklyn] geomacy commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
geomacy commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/pull/44#issuecomment-589242354 > Hi Geoff, I believe this is an alternative solution to the problem @tbouron was fixing. Applying both would result in openjdk not being available. Paul > […](#)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Geoff Macartney
Note that's different from the situation with the Docker image above. If we are distributing source with a Dockerfile, I'd really expect that to "Just Work". I'm tending towards thinking this will mean a -1 from me - open to debate the matter though, what do you all think? Geoff On Thu, 20 Feb 2

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Geoff Macartney
Hi Paul, >Given Debian Buster, the current version doesn't provide a Java 8 JRE, the > Debian package of Apache Brooklyn won't work on that version. > Getting this to work would require the user to install a system-wide JRE 8 > on their machine. That's perfectly OK, we require a Java 8 runtime b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Duncan Grant
+1 (binding) I don't think Paul's reported issue above is a blocker - but I do think we should address this soon. I've run some tests on mac using tar.gz and deployed some apps to aws and gce. All worked as expected so I'm happy for the release to go ahead. Duncan On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 16:03,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Paul Campbell
Hi, I think I've pinned down my errors to my machine having openjdk-11-jre installed. Given Debian Buster, the current version doesn't provide a Java 8 JRE, the Debian package of Apache Brooklyn won't work on that version. Getting this to work would require the user to install a system-wide JRE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc3]

2020-02-20 Thread Paul Campbell
Hi, Trying to test the RC3 deb package on Debian 10 (Buster). I'm not able to start the 'brooklyn' service properly when installed from the Debian package. sudo dpkg -i apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3.deb sudo service brooklyn start Apache Brooklyn never completes startup, but doesn't die either. Por

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc2]

2020-02-20 Thread Iuliana Cosmina
+1 from me Tested apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3-bin.tar.gz on macOs running Catalina 10.15.3. Successfully deployed all blueprints in the quick launch on AWS eu-west-1. Successfully started unpacked and started apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3-vagrant.zip. All nodes were correctly created. Iuliana Cosmina

[VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 1.0.0 [rc2]

2020-02-20 Thread John Campbell
+1 from me Tested apache-brooklyn-1.0.0-rc3-bin.zip on macOS running Mohave 10.14.6 Successfully deployed sample 1 server template successfully on AWS us-east-1 Successfully deployed sample 4 resilient bash web cluster template on AWS us-east-1 John Campbell Software Engineer Cloudsoft | Brin

[GitHub] [brooklyn] kemitix commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
kemitix commented on issue #44: Don't install openjdk URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/pull/44#issuecomment-588926688 Hi Geoff, I believe this is an alternative solution to the problem @tbouron was fixing. Applying both would result in openjdk not being available.

[GitHub] [brooklyn] geomacy commented on a change in pull request #44: Don't install openjdk

2020-02-20 Thread GitBox
geomacy commented on a change in pull request #44: Don't install openjdk URL: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn/pull/44#discussion_r381904448 ## File path: Dockerfile ## @@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ # and PhantomJS FROM maven:3.6.3-jdk-8 -# Install the non-headless JRE as some te