On 2023/02/01 14:37:59 Xiaofeng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The vote to release Apache bRPC 1.4.0 has passed.
>
> The vote PASSED with 4 binding +1, 1 non binding +1 and no -1 votes:
>
It should be 2 non-binding +1 votes.
> Binding votes:
> - Wang Weibing
> - James Ge
> - Cai Daojin
> - He Lei
>
Hi all,
The vote to release Apache bRPC 1.4.0 has passed.
The vote PASSED with 4 binding +1, 1 non binding +1 and no -1 votes:
Binding votes:
- Wang Weibing
- James Ge
- Cai Daojin
- He Lei
Non-binding votes:
- Shuai Liu
- Xiguo Hu
Vote thread:
Hi,
Since we have gotten more than 3+ +1 binding VOTES and the VOTE passed
72+ hours, I will close this and post the RESULT soon.
Thanks and regards,
Xiaofeng
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 10:46 AM He Lei wrote:
>
> +1 binding
> I have checked:
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and
+1 binding
I have checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are correct.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Apache bRPC repo.
[x] No compiled archives are bundled in the
+1 binding
Best Regards,
James Ge
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 5:22 PM Wang,Weibing wrote:
> > OK, besides these, is there anything else that needs highlight?
> #1958, #1990, #2041, #2057 these are also new features.
>
> Best regards
> Weibing
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wang Xiaofeng
> OK, besides these, is there anything else that needs highlight?
#1958, #1990, #2041, #2057 these are also new features.
Best regards
Weibing
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:24 PM Wang Xiaofeng wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023/01/29 05:54:35 "Wang,Weibing" wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I have checked:
Hi,
On 2023/01/29 05:54:35 "Wang,Weibing" wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I have checked:
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for
+1 (non-binding)
I have checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
+1 (binding)
I have checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
[x]
+1 (non-binding)
I have checked:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current
release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary.
Hi Apache bRPC Community,
A big Happy Chinese New Year to everyone.
And this is a call for vote to release Apache bRPC version 1.4.0
[Release Note]
- Add pull_request_template.md by @fansehep in #1952
- Fix the linkage errors caused by duplicate symbols by @adonis0147 in #1936
- Fix "sched_to
11 matches
Mail list logo