Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Daniel Spiewak
The issues with the specs were caused by flaky FSC. I've rejiggered the Rake task to turn off FSC when running the spec suite (for Buildr). All the specs are passing now, so we can go ahead and cut RC2. In the meantime, I'm going to grab the latest from the JRuby 1.5 stream and run through my li

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Antoine Toulme
I'll try to cut RC2 now, unless you're on it ? Thanks Daniel! On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 19:46, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > The issues with the specs were caused by flaky FSC. I've rejiggered the > Rake task to turn off FSC when running the spec suite (for Buildr). All > the > specs are passing now,

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Daniel Spiewak
You better do it. I am not privy to the words of power required to cut a release. That and my Apache username is different from my local username, so the release task doesn't work for me. :-) Daniel On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > I'll try to cut RC2 now, unless you'

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
FYI, jruby 1.5 we'll go to rc 2 next week. After that hopefully only 1 or 2 more weeks before final. On Apr 20, 2010 7:07 PM, "Daniel Spiewak" wrote: We can either issue RC2, or we can go straight to the full release. My impression is that JRuby 1.5 isn't going to go GA for a while, so it's not

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Daniel Spiewak
Good to know! That's still a little late for us, but certainly within the realm of "repackage the all-in-one without telling anyone". :-) Incidentally, I pulled the latest from the jruby-1_5 branch and everything I tried seems to work fine. I didn't do anything even remotely comprehensive thoug