Can we do this?
-1.4.x is the stable stream with 1.8.7 support (JRuby 1.6.7.2)
-1.5.x is MRI 2.2.5, 2.3.1, JRuby 1.7.25 and Jruby 9.0.5.0.
Also looking at Travis:
JDK6 for 1.4.x. stream
JDK7 for 1.4.x and 1.5.x
JDK8 for 1.5.x and going forward
> On Apr 30, 2016, at 2:26 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> an other discussion thread, this time on Scala support.
>
> Does it make sense to move to 2.11.8, or should we move to the latest 2.12
> milestone? I would like to shoot for the latter.
We don't use scala so I have no strong opinion on
Great work!
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Apache Buildr is a build system for Java-based applications, including support
> for Scala, Groovy and a growing number of JVM languages and tools. We wanted
> something that's simple and intuitive to use, so we only need to te
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> I would like to look into dropping all versions of Ruby except for the ones
> officially supported. Looking at MRI, this means 2.1.9, 2.2.5 and 2.3.1.
> For JRuby, that is 1.7.25 and 9.0.50.
>
> Does that make sense?
It makes sense however
Hi all,
an other discussion thread, this time on Scala support.
Does it make sense to move to 2.11.8, or should we move to the latest 2.12
milestone? I would like to shoot for the latter.
We are still using JDK7 for now but need to think of moving to JDK8 soon.
With version 1.5, we can make th
Hi all,
I would like to look into dropping all versions of Ruby except for the ones
officially supported. Looking at MRI, this means 2.1.9, 2.2.5 and 2.3.1.
For JRuby, that is 1.7.25 and 9.0.50.
Does that make sense?
Cheers,
Antoine
