Re: Build failed in Hudson: buildr-ci-build-jruby #49

2010-07-08 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Can you dig a bit more for me? It doesn't appear to be File.chmod or Dir[] plus File.chmod, in a simple test I wrote based on your failing spec (latest OS X, Java 6): ~/projects/buildr ➔ touch foo.txt ~/projects/buildr ➔ ls -l foo.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 headius staff 0 Jul 8 03:07 foo.txt

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Buildr CI on Windows #6

2010-05-28 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Can you maybe pipe these to another list and have people opt-in? If there's going to be a continuous stream of Hudson build emails, I'll probably drop off the buildr dev list. On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:08 AM, anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote: See

Re: 1.4, Windows 7, and a few news

2010-05-20 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com wrote: I've only used buildr on JRuby myself so sorry if this comes across as ignorant. What kind of issues are you guys getting with RJB? I glanced through the code quickly and it seems to basically consist of

Re: Buildr 1.4.0RC2 is out

2010-04-23 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Is it possible to push out some pre gems for the RCs? You'd just need the gemspec version to be 1.4.0.rc2 and it would only be installable using gem install --pre then. It would make it easier on those of us playing with it on JRuby 1.5 :) - Charlie On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Adam Young

Re: Buildr 1.4.0 RC1

2010-04-21 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
FYI, jruby 1.5 we'll go to rc 2 next week. After that hopefully only 1 or 2 more weeks before final. On Apr 20, 2010 7:07 PM, Daniel Spiewak djspie...@gmail.com wrote: We can either issue RC2, or we can go straight to the full release. My impression is that JRuby 1.5 isn't going to go GA for a

Re: JRuby AOT Compilation for All-in-One

2010-04-07 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Antoine Toulme anto...@lunar-ocean.com wrote: For Buildr4OSGi, I would need to create my own distribution of Buildr that includes the Buildr4OSGi gem. Before long, you'll get a mess. It's still a valuable option imo. You can still *use* RubyGems if you want, but