Hi,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Is there a Jira for the TestNG issue? (Or is it already fixed?)
It is already fixed.
> I believe it's worth pushing a release to fix a non-trivial regression, yes.
Ok. WIll kick start a release over the weekend and try to get the fi
Is there a Jira for the TestNG issue? (Or is it already fixed?)
I believe it's worth pushing a release to fix a non-trivial regression, yes.
alex
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter Donald
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Antoine Toulme
> wrote:
>> +1 for the release, thanks for the hard work!
>
> Great. So I have kicked off the start of the release but it looks like
> we can't update the website through the old mechanism
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> +1 for the release, thanks for the hard work!
Great. So I have kicked off the start of the release but it looks like
we can't update the website through the old mechanisms. So I have
started the process of getting it into svnpubsub bu
+1 for the release, thanks for the hard work!
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Donald wrote:
> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/
>
> Specifically:
> http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/buildr-1.
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> Here's my +1 for the release (vote on source package).
>
> However, there's a minor issue on the .gem binaries ... I think the file
> permissions are too restrictive which leads to this kind of problem after
> install:
...snip...
Eep. F
Here's my +1 for the release (vote on source package).
However, there's a minor issue on the .gem binaries ... I think the file
permissions are too restrictive which leads to this kind of problem after
install:
boisvert@smudge:~$ buildr
/usr/local/bin/buildr:23:in `load': no such file to load --
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> It looks like the site is missing images ?
Oops - it looks like they were there but had bad permissions. Fixed now.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
It looks like the site is missing images ? The zip and tar.gz look good,
the PDF looks ok.
I haven't had time to play with the gem yet.
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 2:30 AM, Peter Donald wrote:
> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/
Specifically:
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/buildr-1.4.10.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~donaldp/buildr/1.4.10/dist/buildr-1.4.10.zip
The documentation generated fo
10 matches
Mail list logo
