Looks like a minor bug appeared in our latest release. The fix is as follows.
https://github.com/apache/buildr/commit/ae6f056046126d2ae79b0ef2e4f02176b78923d1
I may try and propose another release before the end of the week to
ensure the bug is not out there too long.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at
Vote passed. Releasing now ...
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote:
> +1 from me too.
>
> On Nov 29, 2017 12:04 AM, "Antoine Toulme" wrote:
>
>> Thank you! My +1 as well.
>>
>> > On Nov 28, 2017, at 21:29, Peter Donald
+1 from me too.
On Nov 29, 2017 12:04 AM, "Antoine Toulme" wrote:
> Thank you! My +1 as well.
>
> > On Nov 28, 2017, at 21:29, Peter Donald wrote:
> >
> > I had some time to do some testing of the latest version so I pushed out
> > the release. Hope
Thank you! My +1 as well.
> On Nov 28, 2017, at 21:29, Peter Donald wrote:
>
> I had some time to do some testing of the latest version so I pushed out
> the release. Hope that is all good.
>
> Anyhoo - I tested with several different builds and are +1
>
> On Wed, Nov
I had some time to do some testing of the latest version so I pushed out
the release. Hope that is all good.
Anyhoo - I tested with several different builds and are +1
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Peter Donald
wrote:
> We're voting on the source distributions
Great.
I just pushed a couple of fixes for bugs/unintended features that we have
noticed in the meantime ;)
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> Allright, sorry for taking my sweet time on this.
>
> I’ll get a new RC rolling over Thanksgiving.
>
>
I’ll look and restart a vote then. Thanks!
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 9:16 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
>
> Actually looked like an easy fix so I committed it to master.
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Peter Donald
> wrote:
>
>> Actually I have just
Actually looked like an easy fix so I committed it to master.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Peter Donald
wrote:
> Actually I have just found a bug. I am not sure if this is a regression or
> an existing bug. I will have a look at it later tonight, if you could hold
>
Actually I have just found a bug. I am not sure if this is a regression or
an existing bug. I will have a look at it later tonight, if you could hold
off releasing a little longer I can explore what the issue is.
Largely it is if we define a package and a classifier of same package that
is not
+1
Ran the MRI variant through all our ci builds
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Alex Boisvert
wrote:
> +1 (not tested)
>
> On Sep 24, 2017 3:02 PM, "Antoine Toulme" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > > On Sep 24, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Antoine Toulme
+1 (not tested)
On Sep 24, 2017 3:02 PM, "Antoine Toulme" wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Sep 24, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
> >
> > We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> >
+1
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote:
>
> We're voting on the source distributions available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildr/1.5.4/dist/
>
> Specifically:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildr/1.5.4/dist/buildr-1.5.4.tgz
>
We're voting on the source distributions available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildr/1.5.4/dist/
Specifically:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildr/1.5.4/dist/buildr-1.5.4.tgz
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/buildr/1.5.4/dist/buildr-1.5.4.zip
The documentation
13 matches
Mail list logo