Refactoring BVal's use of privileges

Hi all, It has been an ongoing goal that BVal be able to operate in a secured environment. I myself have been guilty of causing breakages in this regard due to my own ignorance of Java security. We've accepted submissions of code that attempted to help us shore up our security (BVAL-92),

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal 0.4 Release Candidate

On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Matt Benson mben...@apache.org wrote: I've created a 0.4 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: SVN source tag (r1311510): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/tags/0.4 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BVal 0.4 released

The Apache BVal Team is pleased to announce the release of: Apache BVal 0.4 Apache BVal delivers an implementation of the Java Bean Validation specification 1.0. This release is the first made by the project since having become an ASF top-level project (TLP), and includes such improvements as:

Re: Bean Validation Issue....

Hi, Pedro. In this case you should be using a getter instead of a field in your XML-based constraint declarations (and, as it turns out, that makes this a question for the user list ;) ). It also looks like you're not using the latest BVal release; we encourage you to give Apache BVal 0.4 a try!

Re: [vote] project logo

On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: hi @ all, please have a look at [1] and vote. [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo [ ] -1 i don't

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache BVal 0.5 RC1

Just a reminder: voting on this release closes tomorrow! Thanks, Matt On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Matt Benson mben...@apache.org wrote: Discussion thread for vote on 0.5 release candidate 1, with SVN source tag (r1386834). For more information on the release process, check out http

Re: svn commit: r1394397 - in /bval/trunk: bval-jsr303/pom.xml bval-xstream/pom.xml pom.xml

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:46 AM, mben...@apache.org wrote: Author: mbenson Date: Fri Oct 5 07:46:21 2012 New Revision: 1394397 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394397view=rev Log: reorg some poms; remove refs to slf4j; remove exclusion of commons-logging--this is the responsibility

Re: Website

to my own one :p) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2012/12/13 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: Hi all, Inspired by the recent work done

Re: Website

/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2012/12/13 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com Hi all, Inspired by the recent work done by Mark and co. on the OWB website, I've been working with Twitter

Re: [DISCUSS] moving the bval-guice module efforts from Apache BVal to Apache Onami

This does sound reasonable to me, Simo. Thanks! Matt On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi all BVal friends, recently we setup a new Incubator Podling called Apache Onami which is focused on developing and maintaining a set of Google Guice

Re: [DISCUSS] moving the bval-guice module efforts from Apache BVal to Apache Onami

Hi Simo, We could wait until Onami is ready to do a release, just to ensure continuity. That said, BVal probably won't have another release in the next month or more, so it's probably not a big deal if we go ahead and remove the module now, either. Matt On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:43 PM,

Re: Request to create a branch of 0.4-incubating as a maintenance release.

Hi, Albert. I'm not familiar with the OpenJPA community; I'd be interested, in the interest of understanding the request, to know more about what they do over there and in what context. I'm not sure that, from my POV, it makes sense for the BVal PMC to play host to a particular company's fork.

Re: Dropping the Guice module in Apache BVal

I think we agreed on this when Onami first started incubating? Fine by me. Congrats, Simo! Matt On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi all mates, at Apache Onami we finally released the Onami-Validation 1.0.0 so, as we already previously

Re: svn commit: r1498386 - in /bval/branches/bval-11: bundle/pom.xml bval-core/pom.xml bval-extras/pom.xml bval-guice/pom.xml bval-json/pom.xml bval-jsr303/pom.xml bval-tck/pom.xml bval-tck11/pom.xml

Do we want to do this (go to v2.x)? I had assumed we would follow the lead of e.g. MyFaces, OWB and have our version numbers loosely follow those of our target specification, so Bean Validation 1.1 would be implemented by BVal 1.1.x. Thoughts? Matt On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:30 AM,

Re: svn commit: r1498797 - /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/jsr303/ApacheValidatorFactory.java

I'd prefer not to delete configuration properties just because we're not going to read them again. I am thinking of a situation where someone debugging is going to dump the config and they see the altered version and become confused. Matt On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:22 AM, rmannibu...@apache.org

Re: bean validation 1.1

Great work, Romain! Matt On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, FYI with some hacks (EJB hacks (@Resource) + cdi interceptor hacks (adding beans.xml with needed interceptors instead of using discovery) + jndi hack (lookup)) we get now on this

Re: bean validation 1.1

/rmannibucau* 2013/7/17 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com Great work, Romain! Matt On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, FYI with some hacks (EJB hacks (@Resource) + cdi interceptor hacks (adding beans.xml with needed interceptors

Re: bean validation 1.1

://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/8/12 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com I agree, looks reasonable. :) There is also some stuff at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/bval/sandbox/jsr303

Re: svn commit: r1514466 - in /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/jsr303: BeanDescriptorImpl.java ConstraintAnnotationAttributes.java

I personally like the format strings, but I assume you're removing them to coax out a bit more performance, in which case I'll deal with it. ;-) Matt On Aug 15, 2013 3:17 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote: Author: rmannibucau Date: Thu Aug 15 20:16:44 2013 New Revision: 1514466 URL:

Re: BVal 1.0 and 1.1

case I anticipate we would have a 1.0.x branch, but for everything 1.x the APIs should be compatible IMO. Matt BTW, is the bval-11 branch implementation completed and close to TCK compliant. If not, what else are still missing? Thanks, Albert On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Matt Benson

Re: Bean Validation 1.0

You mean 1.1? It will most likely be Apache BVal v1.1(.0), and I'd (somewhat aggressively) say we'd hope to have it out in the next couple of months. HTH, Matt On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:31 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.comwrote: Hey All, Looking to put together some info on Apache

Re: determine between class and property level constraint

being validated, i am not interested about complete object graph. I need to see more details about violation.getPropertyPath().toString() . Thanks Umesh On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.comwrote: I am still not sure of your terminology. If by class level you

Re: Location of validation.xml

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Michael Blyakher michael.blyak...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the quick replies, and apologies for not being more specific - I was quoting the EE 7 Platform spec as I am particularly interested in using the bval 1.1 implementation that hasn't been

Re: Location of validation.xml

I thought sending the parsing result BTW any urgence on it? Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-19 16:43 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson mben...@apache.org

Re: Location of validation.xml

user. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-18 19:42 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson mben...@apache.org: On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Michael Blyakher

Re: Location of validation.xml

if there are any gotchas and hopefully we can get it working in a TomEE branch or fork before we set it in stone. Okay? Matt On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: Well, in that case I don't see how we can really go wrong there. I'll try to remember to do this as I'm

Re: Location of validation.xml

/rmannibucau 2014-03-19 16:59 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: So are you proposing the SPI look more like: public interface DefaultValidationConfigProvider { org.apache.bval.jsr.xml.ValidationConfigType getDefaultValidationConfig(); } ? Matt On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:57 AM

Re: Location of validation.xml

://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-19 16:52 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: Why can't TomEE rely on BVal for parsing? We should devise something as simple as possible, whatever the case. Matt On Wed

Re: Location of validation.xml

Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-19 17:10 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: Actually, come to think of it, we don't have to do it as a services SPI at all; we

Re: Location of validation.xml

would still try to find the mappings resources itself and fail to do so. Does that make sense? On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: XML constraint mapping files are separate from xml validation config. So you either provide them via Configuration#addMapping

Re: Location of validation.xml

Configuration#addMapping(), but bval would still try to find the mappings resources itself and fail to do so. Does that make sense? On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: XML constraint mapping files are separate from xml validation config. So you either

Re: Location of validation.xml

and calling #addMapping() would solve my problem and I'm pretty sure that it will. Glad we got to the same solution! Is there something tracking this work already that I can follow? On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I haven't yet seen anything

Re: Location of validation.xml

:47, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com a écrit : No, but if you would file a JIRA issue it'd make us feel popular. ;) Thanks, Matt On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Michael Blyakher michael.blyak...@gmail.com wrote: Right after sending of my last email I

Re: Location of validation.xml

/ConfigurationImpl.javais enough Le 19 mars 2014 23:47, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com a écrit : No, but if you would file a JIRA issue it'd make us feel popular. ;) Thanks, Matt On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Michael Blyakher

Re: Location of validation.xml

it. Not sure I see the issue. That's the integration work of EE and not of BVal IMO. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-20 17:31 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson

Re: Location of validation.xml

Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-20 17:53 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: By way of example. let's say the application developer includes WEB-INF/validation.xml

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1628598 [1/2] - in /bval/branches/bval-11: ./ bval-core/ bval-core/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/ bval-core/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/model/ bval-core/src/main/java/org/apach

http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-06 19:29 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: Sorry; I ran the old TCK. I'll check on this later. I think that by default we should leave things as we find them. We can consider including a configuration option

Re: svn commit: r1644241 - /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-core/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/util/reflection/Reflection.java

It can. I'll make the call dynamic. Matt On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Can hasSecurityManager be static? Cant it be set at runtime? -- Message transféré -- De : mben...@apache.org Date : 10 déc. 2014 00:50 Objet : svn commit:

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1644258 - in /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr/src/main/java/org/apache/bval: cdi/ jsr/

On Dec 10, 2014 1:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matt SKIPPED_PREFIXES was designed to be modifiable. Sorry; thanks for the note. It is not sexy but idea was to let other products like tomee change it without having to release bval. Id be happy to have a

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1644258 - in /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr/src/main/java/org/apache/bval: cdi/ jsr/

is set. wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-12-10 14:51 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: On Dec 10, 2014 1:18 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matt

Re: Fwd: svn commit: r1644258 - in /bval/branches/bval-11/bval-jsr/src/main/java/org/apache/bval: cdi/ jsr/

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-12-10 16:09 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com: What is the reason for avoiding ServiceLoader? Don't OWB and others call it? Other than that this approach is fine, but what did you think about a well

BVal charter

Hi, Mohammad! In the VOTE thread at [1] (for some reason your original message is missing) you included a link from the ASF link shortening service for the BVal charter. That link no longer works and I have no idea where our project charter is. Is it possible you have a copy on a system

Re: releasing?

How can we release for > Java 6? +1, anyway Matt On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > Hi guys, > > > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on

Re: Export control information enquiry

Typically, my awareness of ECCN rules for open-source software are that one is only needed for software that includes any type of encryption functionality. Apache BVal does not, therefore we have never applied for an ECCN. To my knowledge there should be no restriction on use of the software

Re: svn commit: r16739 - in /dev/bval/source: ./ bval-parent-1.1.2-SNAPSHOT-source-release.zip bval-parent-1.1.2-SNAPSHOT-source-release.zip.asc bval-parent-1.1.2-SNAPSHOT-source-release.zip.md5 bval-

It will be, yes, as soon as I send out the vote email. Matt On Oct 31, 2016 2:28 AM, "Mark Struberg" wrote: > what is a RC-1 release? > For us to check? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 31.10.2016 um 04:52 schrieb mben...@apache.org: > > > > Author: mbenson > > Date:

[VOTE] Release Apache BVal 1.1.2 from RC1

Hello, I would like to release Apache BVal 1.1.2. Please check the proposed release artifacts and cast your vote. SVN source tag (r1767087): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/bval/tags/1.1.2 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-1003/

[RESULT] Release Apache BVal 1.1.2 from RC1

The final tally: Binding +1 votes were received from Mark Struberg, Romain Manni-Bucau, and myself. No other votes were cast. With that, this release passes. Thanks for voting! Matt On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Matt Benson <mben...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016

[RESULT][VOTE] Migrate BVal SCM to git

With 3 binding +1 votes and no others cast, I will conclude this vote as having passed. Thanks to all who participated in the discussion and vote. Matt On Oct 30, 2017 12:39 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <gpetra...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > &

Re: test failure with latest weaver

A few weird things: * I had published a snapshot of weaver to the Apache snapshots repo so assuming your settings included it you should have been able to pick it up from there. * It sounds like you're running into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEAVER-23, but as you can see in JIRA, I

Re: bval git commit: ensure isGetter methods are consistent between them

Hi Romain, Doesn't this change allow the possibility of, e.g.: Integer isFoo() Being accepted as a valid Java bean property accessor when, in fact, it is not? Br, Matt On Wed, May 16, 2018, 3:53 PM wrote: > Repository: bval > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/bv2

Re: Towards Apache BVal 2.0

mail.com > >: > > > > Sounds good > > > > Maybe just bval-impl then. > > > > Le 1 mai 2018 19:51, "Matt Benson" <gudnabr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rm

Re: Towards Apache BVal 2.0

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 1 mai 2018 18:53, "Matt Benson" <mben...@apache.org> a écrit : > > Hi all, > I have upgraded commons-weaver to be compatible with Java 8 and enhanced > the privilizer mo

Towards Apache BVal 2.0

Hi all, I have upgraded commons-weaver to be compatible with Java 8 and enhanced the privilizer module to handle method references. Our bv2 branch can now successfully run its "sec" profile on Linux. Since it works there but no longer works on Windows, I expect the reason is policy file platform

Re: Status of JavaEE8

Hi, Just trying to find the time to finish the BV2.0 implementation. I didn't get any time over the holidays to work on it but I'm hopeful that I will do so during this next month or two. Thanks, Matt On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Thomas Andraschko wrote: > Hi, >

Re: bval2 release?

Thanks, merged! On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez wrote: > I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg63326.html < > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg63326.html> > > I think this should do

Re: bval2 release?

> > Great. Let me know if I can help. > > > >> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson wrote: > >> > >> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. > >> > >> Matt > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez >

Re: bval2 release?

Cheers,Roberto > On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson < > mben...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks, merged! > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez > > wrote: > > > I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: > >

Re: bval2 release?

ime today or tomorrow to push the > geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. > > If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me and I wait a > bit. > Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 28.08.2018 um 15:5

Re: BVal 2.0 TCK work

gt; LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> > > 2018-04-19 8:42 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Will try to check today > > > > Le 19 avr

Re: bval2 release?

usually keep the sha1 for all the mails etc, and later create a > > sha512 in the dist svn. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > >> Am 11.10.2018 um 01:41 schrieb David Blevins >: > > >> > > >> Ro

Re: bval2 release?

. If everyone is satisfied with this approach we can begin the release process. Other message interpolator context implementations are exempt from this restriction; this permits the TCK's interpolation tests to run unobstructed. Matt On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:56 AM Matt Benson wrote: > Thanks

[VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC1

I've created a 2.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git source tag: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=bval.git;a=tag;h=e828a49ce4bcb8701ddc023f630ef3b18adad950 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-1005

Re: TomEE8 / OWB2.x / BVal2 - slow startup

It would seem we could always filter things even if they weren't present in the environment. The simplest thing to do would be to filter all of Thomas's suggestions, and I would move the list into a classpath resource. Matt On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 5:11 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > It is in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC1

To be clear, I purposely removed the source archive (now archives) from the Maven deployment, but apparently that also removed them from the signing process. This will need to be fixed in the build. Matt On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 2:07 PM Matt Benson wrote: > Thanks Mark. I have genera

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC2

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 3:41 PM Matt Benson wrote: > Hello, since RC1 I have reverted the build to use assembly defaults from > the org.apache:apache Maven parent. This will restore the creation of only > a zip source archive as well as the GPG signature for that archive. As a >

[VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC2

Hello, since RC1 I have reverted the build to use assembly defaults from the org.apache:apache Maven parent. This will restore the creation of only a zip source archive as well as the GPG signature for that archive. As a side effect the signature will resume being uploaded to the Nexus staging

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC2

, 2018 at 2:29 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > sig ok this time ;)sha512 finebuildspasses ratLICENSE fineNOTICE fine > +1 go for it! > And thanks for rolling the release and doing 99% of the work in bv2! > LieGrue,strub > > On Tuesday, 23 October 2018, 22:42:02 CEST, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.0 from RC1

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 3:01 PM Matt Benson wrote: > I've created a 2.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up > for a vote: > > Git source tag: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=bval.git;a=tag;h=e828a49ce4bcb8701ddc023f630ef3b18adad950 > > >

Re: bval2 release?

gt;>>> > >>>> Am Mi., 26. Sep. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > >>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >>>> > >>>>> same here, it will likely not be integrated in tomee 8 anyway. > >>>>&

Re: bval2 release?

ithub.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson a écrit &g

Re: 2.0.2 in Maven

I see bval-jsr 2.0.2 through the UI at https://search.maven.org . Matt On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:29 AM James Meen wrote: > I just took a quick look in Maven to see if bval 2.0.2 is now there. > It is not in Central but there is an ICM repository with version "Unknown" > and date "May 2019". >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BVal 2.0.2

Thanks all for keeping things moving in my absence. I've been consumed with some personal obligations lately. Matt On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:01 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > which makes us 4 +1 (3 bindings) and no other votes so this vote passes, > will continue the release steps ASAP > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal 2.0.3 Release Candidate

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:24 AM Thomas Andraschko < andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a 2.0.3 release candidate, with the following artifacts > up for a vote:e: > > Git source tag:https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=bval.git;a=tags > > Maven staging repo: >

Re: Project website

Hi Andrew, In fact I have used the CMS to edit the site for several years, primarily to post the quarterly board reports there in the interest of transparency. I would like to agree with Romain that we could use straight svnpubsub, but I worry that since the site proper (modulo the Maven-generated

Fwd: Project website

@Andrew: My previous message did not retain you among its recipients. Please see below. Matt -- Forwarded message - From: Matt Benson Date: Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:14 AM Subject: Re: Project website To: Hi Andrew, In fact I have used the CMS to edit the site for several years

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal 2.0.4 Release Candidate

Hi all, I will review this RC Monday. Matt On Fri, Jul 10, 2020, 8:37 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1, thanks Thomas > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: CMS Migration for BVal

d files in the next day or two including > notes on the migration. > > All The Best, > Dave > > > On May 30, 2021, at 9:54 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > > > Hi Dave, > > I made an attempt some time back at a conversion using Hugo, but > > encountered some

Re: CMS Migration for BVal

Hi Dave, I made an attempt some time back at a conversion using Hugo, but encountered some issues and never got a chance to work through these. Our project would definitely appreciate your assistance! Matt On Sat, May 29, 2021, 11:31 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > As you may recall the Apache CMS

Re: Ready for a 2.0.6 release?

o it anyway. BVal is probably the most > > stable > > > lib around TomEE, so i would not care too much about maintainability. > If > > we > > > have like 1 bug in 1/2 year, we can simply port it to a 2.0.x branch. > > > > > > I would do the work, i just need

Re: Ready for a 2.0.6 release?

New release sounds fine to me. I will try to better understand this new issue. Matt On Wed, Mar 23, 2022, 4:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > https://github.com/yupiik/maven-shade-transformers/ > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: Jenkins job to build and deploy snapshots

I don't recall us having one. I sort of had the impression that recurrent snapshots were frowned upon as they might be viewed as "quasi-releases." Matt On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 2:57 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a Jenkins job to build and deploy snapshots? > Can't see anything

Re: Release Apache BVal 2.0.6 as a compatible EE8 and EE9 validation implementation

No objections from me Matt On Fri, Jun 3, 2022, 1:28 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Hi all, > > We are now fully Jakarta Validation compliant, both for EE8 (javax) and EE > 9 (jakarta). > I'd like to release 2.0.6 and create a CSR to get Apache BVal listed as a > compatible implementation. >

Re: Migrate to jakarta namespace

I'm not strongly opinionated either way here but I will note that if we are going to start having a bunch of dependabot upgrade PRs we could increase our release frequency as a result. Matt On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 10:50 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Well, the main change is that it will go 2.x

[jira] [Created] (BVAL-102) Convert Apache* classnames in BVal to BVal*

-incubating Reporter: Matt Benson Unless anyone else prefers a different nomenclature, but Apache* is probably a little too broad. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https

[jira] [Created] (BVAL-103) switch BVal from slf4j to java.util.logging

Reporter: Matt Benson Assignee: Mohammad Nour Team consensus seems to go that the convenience of slf4j for the bval team doesn't justify the potential inconvenience for users, given the slight amount of logging we do. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think

[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-103) switch BVal from slf4j to java.util.logging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243224#comment-13243224 ] Matt Benson commented on BVAL-103: -- Looks good here; we can close as we release

[jira] [Updated] (BVAL-97) More than one META-INF/validation.xml in tomcat webapp

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-97?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson updated BVAL-97: Fix Version/s: 0.4 More than one META-INF/validation.xml in tomcat webapp

[jira] [Updated] (BVAL-82) Validation of inherited methods causes ValidationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson updated BVAL-82: Fix Version/s: (was: 0.4) 0.5 Validation of inherited methods causes

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-63) use java.util.ServiceLoader in DefaultValidationProviderResolver#getValidationProviders()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-63. --- use java.util.ServiceLoader in DefaultValidationProviderResolver#getValidationProviders

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-96) Use correct encoding for localization messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-96. --- Use correct encoding for localization messages

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-94) Missing SVN EOL properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-94. --- Missing SVN EOL properties -- Key: BVAL-94 URL

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-95) Beanvalidation with Generic-DataTypes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-95. --- Beanvalidation with Generic-DataTypes - Key: BVAL-95

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-104) german validation messages properties are broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-104. german validation messages properties are broken

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BVAL-107) Validation of Return-Values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13399702#comment-13399702 ] Matt Benson edited comment on BVAL-107 at 6/22/12 11:05 PM: Any

[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-107) Validation of Return-Values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13400777#comment-13400777 ] Matt Benson commented on BVAL-107: -- Hi, guys. This was a documentation oversight on my

[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-113) Minor performance improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13464441#comment-13464441 ] Matt Benson commented on BVAL-113: -- Hi, thanks for your interest! Would you have any

[jira] [Resolved] (BVAL-115) BVal attempts to decide for user that jcl-over-slf4j should be used instead of commons-logging

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson resolved BVAL-115. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 1394397. BVal attempts to decide for user

[jira] [Resolved] (BVAL-119) DOAP still lists BVAL as incubator project

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson resolved BVAL-119. -- Resolution: Fixed {{Committed revision 1548200.}} {{Committed revision 1548201.}} DOAP still lists

[jira] [Closed] (BVAL-124) Unable to sign up to Mailing List

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson closed BVAL-124. Unable to sign up to Mailing List - Key: BVAL-124

[jira] [Resolved] (BVAL-124) Unable to sign up to Mailing List

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Benson resolved BVAL-124. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Matt Benson Thanks for reporting this! Unable to sign up to Mailing

  1   2   >