Re: RLE v1 versus RLE v2

That’s right. Sorry for the mistake. > On Jan 31, 2018, at 5:15 PM, Michael Mior wrote: > > Xiening, > > It seems as though you intended to send this to the Orc mailing list > instead of Calcite. > > -- > Michael Mior > mm...@apache.org > > > > 2018-01-31 19:31

Re: RLE v1 versus RLE v2

Xiening, It seems as though you intended to send this to the Orc mailing list instead of Calcite. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org 2018-01-31 19:31 GMT-05:00 Xiening Dai : > Hi, > > I am evaluating if we should work as a high priority to add RLEv2 support > in Orc C++

Calcite-Avatica-Master - Build # 38 - Failure

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Calcite-Avatica-Master (build #38) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Calcite-Avatica-Master/38/ to view the results.

Re: dependencies and licensing

re: #3, it's been hashed out many times (here in Calcite and elsewhere in the ASF). The result of which is that there is misleading licensing information, but this dependency is of no concern. On 1/29/18 10:00 AM, Michael Mior wrote: 1. Since we don't publish the dependencies HTML, fixing it