Vladimir,
While I agree this should be resolved, I want to make sure you're not
changing your vote.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2019, 07:11 Vladimir Sitnikov
wrote:
> It looks like Calcite 1.20 violates ASF licensing policy.
>
> The violation is "font-awesome:fonts" which is licensed as
> http://fontawesom
Hamishberridge, you can use RelBuilder#semiJoin [1], the pseudocode seems:
RelNode left = …
RelNode right = ...
relBuilder
.push(left)
.push(right)
.semiJoin(conditions)
BTW, maybe you should use Calcite release 1.20.0 which would be released this
week, the release has improve the join lik
On macOS Mojave 10.14 and jdk1.8.0_161
- checked signatures and checksums OK
- mvn clean install OK
- release note OK
Thanks so much for your work of this huge release, Michael !
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年6月20日 +0800 AM2:44，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On macOS Sierra 10.12.
Try semiJoin in RelBuilder. Maybe that is what you want.
Thanks~
Haisheng Yuan--
发件人：
日 期：2019年06月24日 06:29:38
收件人：Dev
主 题：Subquery
Although I can build a query which looks like
val query =
builder.scan("table1").filter(bu
Although I can build a query which looks like
val query =
builder.scan("table1").filter(builder.equals(builder.field("filed_name1"),
builder.literal("matched_value1"))).project(builder.field("field1_1"))
How can I place this query as subquery which might looks like sql statement
select *
We are adhering to the JDBC specification. Many people find it confusing and
counterintuitive. You are not alone.
I have explained several times over the years.
Look at the tests for that method and similar methods, and read the commits and
JIRA cases that added that code.
Julian
> On Jun 2
We are adhering to the JDBC specification. Many people find it confusing and
counterintuitive. You are not alone.
I have explained several times over the years.
Look at the tests for that method and similar methods, and read the commits and
JIRA cases that added that code.
Julian
> On Jun 2
It seems like the only place we're using Font Awesome is for a link
icon which appears on hover at some part of the site. We could replace
this fairly easily with the Apache-2.0 licensed Unicons. However, it
would be a shame to have to roll a new RC for this. I'm inclined to
take the RFC 2119 inter
It looks like Calcite 1.20 violates ASF licensing policy.
The violation is "font-awesome:fonts" which is licensed as
http://fontawesome.io/license (Font: SIL OFL 1.1, CSS: MIT License)
OFL 1.1 is "category B" (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-112
)
https://www.apache.org/legal/re
