jiezouSH created CALCITE-3433:
-
Summary: EQUALS operator between date/timestamp types returns
false if the type is nullable
Key: CALCITE-3433
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3433
To Stamatis,
Not exactly. My initial thought was giving the physical operator the abiity to
customize and fully control physical property derivation strategy, thus can
further help the purpose driven trait request. But since we agree to think more
high-level API to support on-demand traitset
Definitely agree that this has been a long time missing. I've been
challenged by this absence since before Calcite was Calcite. I also
remember the trials and tribulations around this that Jinfeng references
above.
In general, I think the first thing one might want to before actually doing
this
Great work Francis! I’m + 1 for Stamatis being the PMC chair ~
Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年10月21日 +0800 AM6:47，dev@calcite.apache.org，写道：
>
> Francis
In Apache, a project (i.e. a PMC) is defined by a community, not by a piece of
code.
Is the Avatica community sufficiently separate from the Calcite community that
it wants to govern itself? (In my opinion it is becoming more separate, but not
there yet. I would like to hear what others
xzh_dz created CALCITE-3432:
---
Summary: RexBuilder construct method with the default of
RelDataTypeFactory.
Key: CALCITE-3432
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3432
Project: Calcite
If we want Avatica to be truly independent, then yes, it would have to
be it's own TLP with a separate PMC. (Avatica could not otherwise make
releases and follow other processes without going through the Calcite
PMC.) I think there are several other TLPs with less activity than
Avatica, so I don't
It's the time of the year where we are nearing Calcite's graduation
(birthday) on October 22! It's been a really busy year for Calcite and
we've added quite a few committers to the project with a total of 44
committers on the project.
We have seen 3 releases so far for Calcite this year, with
I think Michael and Julian's proposals are all good ideas.
Regarding moving Avatica to an independent project, what is the process
for doing so? Does this process turn it into a TLP with its own seperate
PMC and PMC Chair? My only concern is that work on Avatica is not as
active as Calcite
Thanks to those who have made some headway during the last week by
reviewing and merging PRs. Would early November be ample time for a rc0?
If more time is needed to review and merged the current PRs on Github,
please let me know.
Francis
On 11/10/2019 8:06 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
Thanks,
10 matches
Mail list logo
