Re: [DISCUSS] Release Managers

Hi Haisheng, I am interested in volunteering. Best, Liya Fan On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 6:50 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > Yes, I am release manager for 1.28. I’ll aim to release first week of > August. > > Somewhat related to the call for release managers: we need active > committers. (Stamatis, can

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Managers

Yes, I am release manager for 1.28. I’ll aim to release first week of August. Somewhat related to the call for release managers: we need active committers. (Stamatis, can you run your stats on PRs and active committers?) On May 21, I noted that PR backlog is building up, and appealed for 5

[DISCUSS] Release Managers

Hi all, In the next half year, I hope we can get back to the pace of release for every 2 months. We need more release managers for the next few releases, is there any one interested in volunteering to be release manager? Currently Julian is the release manager for 1.28.0, we need 3 more for

Master branch is open for commits

Hi all, Apache Calcite 1.27.0 has been released, therefore the master is again open. Best, Stamatis

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.27.0 (release candidate 0)

Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their comments and votes. The tally is as follows. 5 binding +1s: Stamatis Zampetakis Francis Chuang Julian Hyde Haisheng Yuan Ruben Quesada Lopez 1 binding -1: Vladimir Sitnikov 2 non-binding +1s: Alessandro Solimando Igor

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4636) Wrong RelCollation if Group by field appears in Order by clause

Rafay A created CALCITE-4636: Summary: Wrong RelCollation if Group by field appears in Order by clause Key: CALCITE-4636 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4636 Project: Calcite

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4635) Distinct on aggregate window functions produce wrong result

James Kim created CALCITE-4635: -- Summary: Distinct on aggregate window functions produce wrong result Key: CALCITE-4635 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4635 Project: Calcite

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4634) Improve AggregateProjectPullUpConstantsRule to remove all constant keys

Yingyu created CALCITE-4634: --- Summary: Improve AggregateProjectPullUpConstantsRule to remove all constant keys Key: CALCITE-4634 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4634 Project: Calcite

Re: Deduplicate correlate variables question.

The PR needs to fix a bug or implement a feature. So, first you should log a JIRA case describing what doesn’t work. Write tests for what doesn’t work that you want to make work. (Or maybe you can refactor/generalize existing tests.) Then submit a PR, and we will review that PR on the

Re: Deduplicate correlate variables question.

The PR needs to fix a bug or implement a feature. So, first you should log a JIRA case describing what doesn’t work. Write tests for what doesn’t work that you want to make work. (Or maybe you can refactor/generalize existing tests.) Then submit a PR, and we will review that PR on the basis of

Re: Deduplicate correlate variables question.

Julian, thanks for reply and comments. Can you explain, is it would possible to commit PR containing deduplication code moved upper this flag ? If so - i will create PR and rerun all existing tests, of course. Thanks ! Master is a moving target. Apparently you are using a version of the code

Re: [HELP] SqlParserImpl#jj_scan_token hangs?

Ruben, The next time the case reproduces, please collect the core dump. At least you would be able to analyze it later. It might be a VM issue (e.g. failing compilation), or it might be a concurrency issue (e.g. data race in the parser code), or something completely different. You might find

[HELP] SqlParserImpl#jj_scan_token hangs?

Hello, in a downstream project we have experienced a strange phenomenon around Calcite SQL parser. To sum up, while running (sequentially) several thousand times (around 20K) different instances of the "same" query (not sure if the query itself is relevant, but just in case I share how it looks