Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA vs GitHub Issues

2021-11-30 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov
>I know people/companies who have built tools/plugins >around JIRA for getting useful information such as which internal forks >have this particular fix, etc That is true. However, I do not know what should we do about it. Of course, any change brings hidden costs, so if the benefits are unclear,

Re: calcite-core 1.28.0 now depends on kotlin-stdlib?

2021-11-30 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Nice. Anyone know if there is a tool to fingerprint dependencies between releases so we can avoid introducing new dependencies accidentally? On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:26 PM Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > It seems that Vladimir fixed this already in [1]. > > [1] > >

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4911) CAST operation should throw an exception when cast DECIMAL type lose significant digits

2021-11-30 Thread duan xiong (Jira)
duan xiong created CALCITE-4911: --- Summary: CAST operation should throw an exception when cast DECIMAL type lose significant digits Key: CALCITE-4911 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4911

Re: calcite-core 1.28.0 now depends on kotlin-stdlib?

2021-11-30 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
It seems that Vladimir fixed this already in [1]. [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/f3e2f041567e35e65464676d3171db3b5f2ddf9c On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:50 PM Jacques Nadeau wrote: > Can you file a JIRA? We should address before 1.29. > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 6:40 AM Zoltan Farkas

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA vs GitHub Issues

2021-11-30 Thread Stamatis Zampetakis
Thanks for starting this discussion Vladimir and all those sharing your experience. Quite interesting information so far. As usual, there are advantages and disadvantages between GitHub issues and JIRA issues. In order to avoid writing an overly long email I will try to focus on those aspects

Re: calcite-core 1.28.0 now depends on kotlin-stdlib?

2021-11-30 Thread Jacques Nadeau
Can you file a JIRA? We should address before 1.29. On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 6:40 AM Zoltan Farkas wrote: > According to the published pom it is a direct dependency: > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/calcite/calcite-core/1.28.0/calcite-core-1.28.0.pom > < >

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA vs GitHub Issues

2021-11-30 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov
>I think the easiest thing is to focus on the >"workflow" for each "persona" we have While I agree the questions you raise are valid, I would say, that moving to GitHub Issues does not really change the workflow except in certain small cases. I doubt there's an exhaustive list of answers for

Snowflake VARIANT support

2021-11-30 Thread Sandeep Nayak
Hello, I am a newbie to Calcite and still trying to figure all the pieces of the project. In looking for support in Calcite to parse Snowflake expressions I ran into a question asked earlier this month on the dev mail list which is pretty much exactly what I am trying to do. Simon asked the

Re: [DISCUSS] JIRA vs GitHub Issues

2021-11-30 Thread Josh Elser
Thanks for your reply, Vladimir. On 11/29/21 4:44 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: Do you think Calcite has something unique in the release process that makes GitHub infeasible? Nope, just calling attention that we want releases to be "easy" to make and anyone should be able to make them (not

Re: calcite-core 1.28.0 now depends on kotlin-stdlib?

2021-11-30 Thread Zoltan Farkas
According to the published pom it is a direct dependency: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/calcite/calcite-core/1.28.0/calcite-core-1.28.0.pom > On Nov 29, 2021, at 11:41 PM, Vladimir