Shiven Dvrk created CALCITE-4984:
Summary: RelNode decorrelations is generating wrong group keys
Key: CALCITE-4984
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4984
Project: Calcite
Iss
Hello Stamatis,
I sent my proposal on the original meeting thread.
Forgot to ask: What is the exact day of the event?
I see January 19 mentioned here:
https://www.meetup.com/Apache-Calcite/events/282836907/
And you mentioned January 17 on this email.
Regards,
--
Eugen Stan
+40770 941 271
Hello Stamatis,
I would also like to share my work.
Title: calcite-clj - First steps using Calcite with Clojure
Abstract: A quick introduction on using Calcite with Clojure language. I'll go
through an simple example on how to use in memory table.
The example will cover REPL driven developmen
Thanks Haisheng! Looks good to me.
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le ven. 7 janv. 2022 à 12:32, Haisheng Yuan a écrit :
> Attached below is a draft of this month's board report. I plan to submit it
> on Jan 11.
> Please let me know if you have additions or corrections.
>
> ## Description:
>
Ziwei Liu created CALCITE-4983:
--
Summary: In SubstitutionVisitor, create a Calc when there has
condition need pull up.
Key: CALCITE-4983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4983
Project: C
Thanks Ruben for pointing me to the answer. I was not subscribed to the dev
list at that time and so missed this response.
Thanks again for your help.On Tuesday, January 11, 2022, 08:29:50 AM EST,
Ruben Q L wrote:
Hello,
if I am not mistaken, there were already some answers to you
Hey Vladimir,
when this issue appeared it was
RelTraitSet desired = cluster.traitSet()
.replace(BindableConvention.INSTANCE);
RelNode expectedRoot = planner.changeTraits(root, desired);
planner.setRoot(expectedRoot);
And then
RelNode exp = planner.findBestExp();
So the root node had no s
Hello,
if I am not mistaken, there were already some answers to your original
email, please check
https://lists.apache.org/thread/xghcjo5xwn04ylyow5h7to507ts91qs3
Best regards,
Ruben
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:09 PM M Singh
wrote:
> Hi folks:
> I apologize for sending the message again but wa
Hi folks:
I apologize for sending the message again but wanted to see if there is any
advice/pointers on understanding Calcite code generation. If I have missed
the response, please forward it to one more time.
Thanks again for your help.
Mans
Hi:
I am working on a project that requires chan
Thanks Jess for your pointers. I will checkout the references you have
provided. Mans
On Sunday, January 9, 2022, 06:01:47 PM EST, Jess Balint
wrote:
Hi Mans,
This statement in the Javadoc sums it up for me:
Generally a Table will implement this interface to create a particular
Hi,
If I recall correctly, the SQL standard is mostly silent on how one should
coerce operands. Therefore different systems implement the coercion at
their discretion. Moreover, the type inference might be influenced not only
by operands types but by their nature as well. For example, a target sys
Hi Julian,
When invoking the optimizer, you may provide the desired trait set of the
top-level node. It might happen, that the specific collation is not
requested from the optimizer, and hence the plan with a top-level Sort
operator is not chosen. Could you please show how you invoke the planner?
Hey Stamatis,
yes, thats why I looked it up at first… the results are wrong : )
So both tables for themselves are sorted but the Full Join is finally two
blocks. The Left Join (sorted like the left rel) and then the remaining entries
from the right side (also ordered). But overall not ordered.
Hi Julian F,
Quite a naive question but did you get wrong results from the given plan? A
missing sort is not necessarily problematic.
I hope I am not saying something stupid but I think there are cases where a
full join algorithm can retain the order of some of its inputs.
Best,
Stamatis
On Tue
14 matches
Mail list logo
