Stream-stream joins

this feature? Is [3] the way to go in the foreseeable future? If so, is anyone working on it at the moment? Piotr Nowojski [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KaAkPZjWFeu-ffrC9FhYuxE6CIKsatHTTxyrxSBR8Sk/edit?ts=5b45fea6#heading=h.avxnnym51mbe <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KaA

Re: Stream-stream joins

ro rather than a > table function.> > > Julian> > > > On Jul 11, 2018, at 6:55 AM, Piotr Nowojski > > wrote:> > > > > > Hi,> > > > > > In Flink we are now discussing how to implement “enrichment joins” (stream &g

VARCHAR literals

Hi, We have small problem with CHAR type in Flink. Officially we do not support it and all input/output columns are of type VARCHAR. Because of that, nobody has ever thought about CHAR semantic (for example correctly handling padding in comparisons or other functions). However this collides wit

Re: VARCHAR literals

We know about this switch. Unfortunately it only solves/hides one of the problems. > On 6 Sep 2018, at 20:02, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Does https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2321 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2321> help? > > >> On

Re: VARCHAR literals

Julian, would you be ok if we provided a contribution containing a configurable switch for string literal type? Piotrek > On 6 Sep 2018, at 20:47, Piotr Nowojski wrote: > > We know about this switch. Unfortunately it only solves/hides one of the > problems. > >> On

Re: VARCHAR literals

t’s not done properly Calcite will > be picking up the pieces for years. > > Julian > > >> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:26 AM, Piotr Nowojski wrote: >> >> Julian, would you be ok if we provided a contribution containing a >> configurable switch for string literal ty

Intention behind RelNode.accept(RexShuttle)

node. So can we leave this method with the default implementation `return this;` as Aggregate node does it? Thanks, Piotr Nowojski

Re: Intention behind RelNode.accept(RexShuttle)

s not > contain row expressions (RexNode). If the node you introduce uses row > expressions then it makes sense to apply the shuttle to every expression. > > Best, > Stamatis > > Στις Πέμ, 31 Ιαν 2019 στις 5:39 μ.μ., ο/η Piotr Nowojski < > pi...@da-platform.com> έγραψε

Re: Intention behind RelNode.accept(RexShuttle)

of a RelNode are > sub-types of RexNode, RexShuttle processes them, otherwise it ignores them. > But pragmatically, as long as what you do doesn’t break the tests, it’s OK. > >> On Feb 4, 2019, at 1:05 AM, Piotr Nowojski wrote: >> >> Hi Stamatis, >> >>