this feature? Is [3] the way to go in the foreseeable future? If so,
is anyone working on it at the moment?
Piotr Nowojski
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KaAkPZjWFeu-ffrC9FhYuxE6CIKsatHTTxyrxSBR8Sk/edit?ts=5b45fea6#heading=h.avxnnym51mbe
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KaA
ro rather than a
> table function.>
>
> Julian>
>
> > On Jul 11, 2018, at 6:55 AM, Piotr Nowojski
> > wrote:>
> > >
> > Hi,>
> > >
> > In Flink we are now discussing how to implement “enrichment joins” (stream
&g
Hi,
We have small problem with CHAR type in Flink. Officially we do not support it
and all input/output columns are of type VARCHAR. Because of that, nobody has
ever thought about CHAR semantic (for example correctly handling padding in
comparisons or other functions). However this collides wit
We know about this switch. Unfortunately it only solves/hides one of the
problems.
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 20:02, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> Does https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2321
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2321> help?
>
>
>> On
Julian, would you be ok if we provided a contribution containing a configurable
switch for string literal type?
Piotrek
> On 6 Sep 2018, at 20:47, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
>
> We know about this switch. Unfortunately it only solves/hides one of the
> problems.
>
>> On
t’s not done properly Calcite will
> be picking up the pieces for years.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:26 AM, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
>>
>> Julian, would you be ok if we provided a contribution containing a
>> configurable switch for string literal ty
node. So can we leave this method with the default
implementation `return this;` as Aggregate node does it?
Thanks, Piotr Nowojski
s not
> contain row expressions (RexNode). If the node you introduce uses row
> expressions then it makes sense to apply the shuttle to every expression.
>
> Best,
> Stamatis
>
> Στις Πέμ, 31 Ιαν 2019 στις 5:39 μ.μ., ο/η Piotr Nowojski <
> pi...@da-platform.com> έγραψε
of a RelNode are
> sub-types of RexNode, RexShuttle processes them, otherwise it ignores them.
> But pragmatically, as long as what you do doesn’t break the tests, it’s OK.
>
>> On Feb 4, 2019, at 1:05 AM, Piotr Nowojski wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stamatis,
>>
>>