Congratulations Danny!
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:45 PM Stamatis Zampetakis
wrote:
> Congrats Danny, and thanks a lot for all the effort you are putting in
> helping others and improving Calcite.
>
> Among so many high quality contributions it is difficult to express
> preferences, nevertheless I
Congratulations Shuyi!
--
Rong
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:05 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote:
> Hi Shuyi,
>
> Congratulations for becoming a Calcite committer and thank you for all the
> contributions to Calcite (and Flink)!
>
> Best,
> Fabian
>
> 2018-04-04 1:18 GMT+02:00 Michael Mior :
>
> > If you ev
Thanks for the fantastic proposal @shuyi. I think the STRUCT idea is great
considering ROW is not standard SQL either. As a user of calcite I have a
couple questions.
Since ROW constructor is so similar with STRUCT, would it be a good idea to
consolidate the two syntax? Or have a clear distinction
Just to add to @shuyi's point and fyi: TUMBLE is implemented in
CALCITE-1603[1].
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1603
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:17 PM, Shuyi Chen wrote:
> Just curious, can you explain what the TUMBLE function is? There is already
> a TUMBLE function in Calcite
Hi Devs,
I am trying to utilize Calcite type inference in my Flink and realize that
one of the situations will cause exception when trying to infer the operand
type based on a StructType return type. [1]
Seems like there's a requirement [2] that if return type is a struct, the
operand # and retur
u perhaps reproduce this as SQL (DDL plus a query) in the “server”
> module, say server/src/test/resources/sql/type.iq?
>
>
> > On Aug 14, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Rong Rong wrote:
> >
> > Hi Devs,
> >
> > I am trying to utilize Calcite type inference in my Fli
Rong Rong created CALCITE-3008:
--
Summary: Making AuxiliaryConverter Pluggable
Key: CALCITE-3008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3008
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Improvement
Rong Rong created CALCITE-5301:
--
Summary: Support AT TIME ZONE
Key: CALCITE-5301
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5301
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: New Feature
Rong Rong created CALCITE-5740:
--
Summary: Support for AggToSemiJoinRule
Key: CALCITE-5740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5740
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Bug
Rong Rong created CALCITE-5787:
--
Summary: Add interface in RelNode for getInputFieldsUsed
Key: CALCITE-5787
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5787
Project: Calcite
Issue Type
Rong Rong created CALCITE-5833:
--
Summary: Support `getOperandLiteralValue` in
`Aggregate.AggCallBinding`
Key: CALCITE-5833
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5833
Project: Calcite
Rong Rong created CALCITE-6064:
--
Summary: Incorrect TraitSet copying logic in LogicalJoin?
Key: CALCITE-6064
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6064
Project: Calcite
Issue Type
Rong Rong created CALCITE-2468:
--
Summary: Index Out-of-Bound Exception when trying to infer operand
type from struct return type
Key: CALCITE-2468
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2468
Rong Rong created CALCITE-2542:
--
Summary: SqlNode AtomicRowExpression + DOT operation does not work
for constructed ROWs
Key: CALCITE-2542
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2542
Project
Rong Rong created CALCITE-2721:
--
Summary: Support parsing of DOT + MEMBER_FUNCTION
Key: CALCITE-2721
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2721
Project: Calcite
Issue Type
Rong Rong created CALCITE-2862:
--
Summary: Deprecated ExprSimplifier causes some operands not being
simplified
Key: CALCITE-2862
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2862
Project: Calcite
Rong Rong created CALCITE-2906:
--
Summary: Record DOT extension does not distinguish between simple
and compound identifiers
Key: CALCITE-2906
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2906
17 matches
Mail list logo