Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label

2019-01-08 Thread Michael Mior
+1 for standardizing. No opinion on which one we use. -- Michael Mior mm...@apache.org Le lun. 7 janv. 2019 à 16:13, Julian Hyde a écrit : > There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is > available for a JIRA case. > > 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see >

Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label

2019-01-07 Thread Hequn Cheng
+1 for “pull-request-available”. On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jark Wu wrote: > +1 for "pull-request-available" > > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 05:33, Francis Chuang > wrote: > > > +1 for "pull-request-available" > > > > On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > There seem to be two

Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label

2019-01-07 Thread Jark Wu
+1 for "pull-request-available" On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 05:33, Francis Chuang wrote: > +1 for "pull-request-available" > > On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > > There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is > available for a JIRA case. > > > > 1. The “Patch” flag (13

Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label

2019-01-07 Thread Francis Chuang
+1 for "pull-request-available" On 8/01/2019 8:13 am, Julian Hyde wrote: There seem to be two mechanisms to indicate that a pull-request is available for a JIRA case. 1. The “Patch” flag (13 issues); see

Re: "Patch" flag vs. "pull-request-available" label

2019-01-07 Thread Vladimir Sitnikov
> “pull-request-available” +1 Vladimir