My apologies, Michael.
I like the idea of using labels to categorize the PRs. For instance,
something like "xs", "small", "medium", "large" etc to categorize the
scope of the change might make it easier for committers to identify
easy-to-review PRs. This might be useful for those who are not
Thanks Francis! My last name is spelled Mior, not Moir, but other than that
looks good to me. I have no opinion on whether the problem with PRs should
be placed under "Issues" so I'll defer to Julian's Apache experience on
that.
Technical solutions are certainly not going to solve the problem
Thanks, Julian!
I mentioned changing the PMC Chair and the migration to gitbox.
I also added a bit about the reviewing of PRs under "issues". I am not
quite sure what the board can do to help us, but I do hope this is
something we can address soon for Calcite. Avatica and Avatica-Go seem
to
Even though you probably don’t want to blow your own trumpet, Francis, I think
we should call out the change of VP, and the fact that we have had a "peaceful
transition of power” to a new person every year since graduation. I am proud of
this particular Calcite tradition, and one excellent side
Thanks Kevin, looks like I forgot the version number (1.13) for Avatica.
I'll also move it to a separate paragraph, so that it's more prominent.
Francis
On 3/01/2019 8:34 am, Kevin Risden wrote:
Should call out the Avatica release in the Activity section.
Kevin Risden
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at
Attached below is a draft of this month's board report. Please let me
know if you have any additions or corrections.
## Description:
Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
planning queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows
database-like access, and in
