Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-08 Thread Julian Hyde
There are several categories of "important": Breaking: 2569, 3923, 4079. Highlights: 4134 (interval expressions), 4080 (character literals as aliases), 3923 (change how planner rules are parameterized); 2160 (spatial functions). On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 1:11 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-08 Thread Andrei Sereda
I would say yes. On Sat, Aug 8, 2020, 13:32 Rui Wang wrote: > Is the highlight section a right place for [1] as it has bigger impact? > > > [1] > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/19edf52c76c6a1507721f5bd37f2a33497aa0c4c > > -Rui > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:48 PM Andrei Sereda wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-08 Thread Rui Wang
Is the highlight section a right place for [1] as it has bigger impact? [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/19edf52c76c6a1507721f5bd37f2a33497aa0c4c -Rui On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 9:48 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides removal of deprecated methods ? Currently it says: === This release comes shortly after 1.24.0 (in just two weeks) and removes methods which were deprecated in the previous version. === Thanks, Andrei. On Fri, Aug 7,

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Andrei Sereda
Hello, I'm starting the release today. If there are some PRs which you would like to be included in 1.25 please let me know ASAP. This should be a quick release mostly for CALCITE-4136 Thanks, Andrei. On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:33 AM Julian Hyde wrote: > Andrei, > > We agreed that this would

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-08-07 Thread Julian Hyde
Andrei, We agreed that this would be a quick release. Above I mentioned Aug 8th as a target, and it's Aug 7th already. Can you start moving the release process along, please. Julian On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda wrote: > > Julian, > > Yes this time I should have enough cycles

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-07-24 Thread Andrei Sereda
Julian, Yes this time I should have enough cycles for the release. Also, I think Danny did the heavy lifting with 1.22 since it wasn't an easy one. Andrei. On Fri, Jul 24, 2020, 16:16 Julian Hyde wrote: > Andrei, > > That would be great. Last time I recall you had a crunch at $dayjob that >

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-07-24 Thread Julian Hyde
Andrei, That would be great. Last time I recall you had a crunch at $dayjob that didn’t leave you with enough cycles to be release manager. I think this release should be timely, so if that is a concern this time around, let us know. (Maybe the fact that this release is very time-boxed will

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-07-24 Thread Andrei Sereda
It should be me. I swapped the 1.22 release with Danny Chen who was supposed to be release manager for 1.25 On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:52 PM Haisheng Yuan wrote: > Do we have release manager for v1.25.0? > > > On 2020/07/23 17:15:12, Julian Hyde wrote: > > The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just

Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-07-24 Thread Haisheng Yuan
Do we have release manager for v1.25.0? On 2020/07/23 17:15:12, Julian Hyde wrote: > The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just passed [1], and it will be released > shortly. > > We planned that release 1.24 is a transitional release, and 1.25 will follow > soon afterwards. 1.24 deprecates some

[DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.25.0

2020-07-23 Thread Julian Hyde
The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just passed [1], and it will be released shortly. We planned that release 1.24 is a transitional release, and 1.25 will follow soon afterwards. 1.24 deprecates some APIs that we intend to remove in 1.25. We had to make the release so that people can see that the