> Andrei wrote:
>
> 1.32 history section is being added as a jekyll comment and is not visible
> on the public site
Oops, my bad. I didn’t notice the comment markers. I should have reviewed more
carefully. I think it’s fine to leave it in.
> Overall I'm inclined to create RC1 mainly because of i
I have started a separate thread for RC1.
Among fixes that have been discussed previously, it also includes new
Avatica version 1.22: CALCITE-5221
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 6:33 PM Andrei Sereda wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the detailed feedback.
>
> Regarding differences between git and src re
Hello,
Thanks for the detailed feedback.
Regarding differences between git and src releases (empty folders reported
by Stamatis) it is indeed a stale state of my branch. It is the main reason
I'd like to make a clean (RC1) release candidate.
Some answers to Julian's notes:
> 1. It's strange tha
Andrei, Thank you for being release manager!
Downloaded, checked signatures & checksums, LICENSE, NOTICE, howto.md;
compiled and ran tests using OpenJDK 18 and Gradle-7.4.2 on Ubuntu
Linux.
My vote is 0 (binding) due to the arrow and .mvn directories noted by
Stamatis. I will change my vote to +1
Thanks Andrei for being RM.
- Checksum and signature: ok
- Gradle test: ok
- Calcite-based application test suite: ok
- I confirm the diff issues already described by Stamatis, not sure if this
should be a blocking problem or not.
My vote is: 0 (binding)
Best,
Ruben
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:0
Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS, jdk1.8.0_261, Gradle wrapper, Gradle 7.4.2
* Checked signatures and checksums OK
* Went over release note OK (left some comments in the draft PR)
* Built from git tag and run tests (./gradlew clean build) OK
* Built from source artifacts and run unit tests + slow tests OK
Thanks for being RM for this release, Andrei.
My vote is: +1 (binding)
- Verified GPG signature - OK
- Verified SHA512 - OK
- Checked release notes on tag
(https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md)
- OK
- Ran tests (gradle check) - OK
- Spot checked Nexu
+1 (non-binding)
- checked checksum and signatures: OK
- checked NOTICE/LICENSE in source and jar: OK
- build and test from source: OK
- build javadoc: OK
- checked with older guava versions(19.0): OK
Besides, I would like to bring up CALCITE-5092.
I checked our release process, and found that we
Hi everyone,
I have verified signatures for distribution, built it, run all unit tests, and
no issues are found.
Also, I have checked the new Calcite version with Apache Drill, and it works
fine, all Drill unit tests also pass.
+1 (binding)
Kind regards,
Volodymyr Vysotskyi
On 2022/07/23 03:
Hello everyone,
thanks a lot Andrei for all the work behind this release, very much
appreciated.
My vote is +1 (non-binding) but I would like to highlight the differences I
noticed with respect to the tag when checked out from the git repo, it does
not look major but I don't remember seeing a simi
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.31.0, release
candidate 0.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.31.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
The commit to be voted upon:
https://gitbox
11 matches
Mail list logo
