Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.37.0, release
candidate 0.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.37.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md
The commit to be voted upon:
https://gitbox
Thanks for being RM for this release, Sergey!
My vote is: +1 (binding)
- Verified GPG signature - OK
- Verified SHA512 - OK
- Diffed source release and git repository - OK
- Checked release notes on tag
(https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/calcite-1.37.0-rc0/site/_docs/history.md)
- OK
- C
Thanks Sergey for preparing this release.
Just a minor clarification: the email subject says "release candidate 1",
but we are actually voting rc0.
- Release notes: ok (with some minor comments that I have left in the PR)
- Checksum: ok
- Signature: ok
- Diff source release and git repository: ok
+1 (binding)
- Checked signature and checksum (OK)
- Checked LICENSE and Copyright year (OK)
- Checked there are no unexpected binary files (OK)
- Build and test from source (testContributorsFileIsSorted and
testMailmapFile in LintTest failed due to not in git repo)
- Reviewed release note, left s
Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS, jdk1.8.0_261, Gradle wrapper, Gradle 7.6.1
* Checked signatures and checksums OK
* Checked diff between repo and artifacts OK
* Went over release note OK (Left comments in the PR)
* Checked README, NOTICE, LICENSE OK
* All source files have ASF headers OK (raised [1] for t
Thanks Stamatis for signalling this issue
I think we need to put Blocker priority on this jira issue
(CALCITE-6385[1]) if we consider it as a no go for the release (please
correct me if I'm wrong)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6385
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:59 AM Stamatis Za
I think Stamatis is right. We should cancel this vote, fix CALCITE-6385 and
produce a new RC.
Best,
Ruben
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:50 PM Sergey Nuyanzin
wrote:
> Thanks Stamatis for signalling this issue
>
> I think we need to put Blocker priority on this jira issue
> (CALCITE-6385[1]) if we
Yes, agree, CALCITE-6385 is a blocker. I'll cancel the vote.
Thanks for finding this, Stamatis, thanks Ruben for clarification,
and thanks for all who took the time to vote.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:01 PM Ruben Q L wrote:
> I think Stamatis is right. We should cancel this vote, fix CALCITE-638
Cancel this thread, due to CALCITE-6385[1] issue in the build.
Thanks to Stamatis for highlighting this.
Will start another vote once the issue will be fixed and merged.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6385
--
Best regards,
Sergey
