Hey, folks. We need your input here. This is a crisis.
I do not want us to become a project where people rule by veto, override
consensus, and (heaven forbid) back out each other’s commits. But this case is
the third instance where this has happened (2438 and 2458 are the other
instances, all w
Juilian>Hey, folks. We need your input here.
Here are my thoughts:
1) I think the features we add should have at least some level of
consistency
2) It is much safer to adopt well-known features rather than be pioneers in
the field. I do not mean we must wait for someone else implement and try
out
Vladimir,
You’ve made your points. And I hear them.
However I get the impression that you are not open to persuasion. Which means
that I am wasting my time trying to reach consensus with you. Which means that
people win arguments not on merit, but based upon who is most persistent.
Here is my
My apologies for missing this thread a couple days ago. (Thanks for pinging
it.) Here's my two cents: taking care of contributors to the project is
just as important (if not more important) than taking care of the code. I'm
not saying we should merge terrible code just to keep each other happy, but
I do not believe there is enough reason to block CALCITE-525. IMO, CALCITE-525
describes a problem that some Calcite users are facing and a reasonable
plugable solution. We should not be vetoing such a feature without providing
viable alternatives. (Without having checked the specific implementa
ure is
very important. If we don't really need such a feature now, I think I can help
whenever it is considered helpful in future.
Thanks,
Hongze
From: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
Date: 2018-10-18 10:26
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exception-handling in built-in functions
I do not
18 10:26
To: dev@calcite.apache.org<mailto:dev@calcite.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Exception-handling in built-in functions
I do not believe there is enough reason to block CALCITE-525. IMO, CALCITE-525
describes a problem that some Calcite users are facing and a reasonable
plugable solution. We sh
ed such a feature now, I think I
> can help whenever it is considered helpful in future.
>
> Thanks,
> Hongze
>
> From: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
> Date: 2018-10-18 10:26
> To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Exception-handling in built-in functions
> I do not believ
