[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58683#action_58683 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: trunk: 931444. Configurable cache size for

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2619) CamelContext - createProducerTemplate - let it return a started template

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2619. Resolution: Fixed trunk: 931444. CamelContext - createProducerTemplate - let it return a

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58684#action_58684 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: You can now set a {{maximumCacheSize}} on those

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58685#action_58685 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: You can change the default size of 1000, to a custom

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58686#action_58686 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: The {{ProducerServicePool}} does not have any

Re: [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2536) Improved quickfix component

Hi Claus I have sent the CLA to the foundation by smail a couple of weeks ago, but nothing happened so far. Is there something that needs to be done? I've seen formal invitation is mentioned on the website. I may just have to send it again? Thanks, Beat JIRA j...@apache.org wrote: [

Re: [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2536) Improved quickfix component

Hi Can you find your name in this page? http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, beat glattfelder b...@glattfelder.com wrote: Hi Claus I have sent the CLA to the foundation by smail a couple of weeks ago, but nothing happened so far. Is

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-2621) File consumer - Polling from network share on Windows may regard files as not a file

File consumer - Polling from network share on Windows may regard files as not a file Key: CAMEL-2621 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2621

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2621) File consumer - Polling from network share on Windows may regard files as not a file

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2621. Resolution: Fixed trunk: 931466 File consumer - Polling from network share on Windows may

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58688#action_58688 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: trunk: 931471. ProducerCache is now managed in JMX

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2558) Configurable cache size for ConsumerTemplate and ProducerTemplate

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58689#action_58689 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2558: Added FAQ

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-2622) Invocation of hasNext() on org.apache.camel.util.ObjectHelper.createIterator(...).new IteratorNode() {...} return different results

Invocation of hasNext() on org.apache.camel.util.ObjectHelper.createIterator(...).new IteratorNode() {...} return different results - Key:

[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-2622) Invocation of hasNext() on org.apache.camel.util.ObjectHelper.createIterator(...).new IteratorNode() {...} return different results

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sergey Zolotaryov updated CAMEL-2622: - Attachment: patchfile.txt patch Invocation of hasNext() on

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-2623) SEDA/VM - Add support for chained endpoints when using request/reply in async fashion

SEDA/VM - Add support for chained endpoints when using request/reply in async fashion - Key: CAMEL-2623 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2623

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2622) Invocation of hasNext() on org.apache.camel.util.ObjectHelper.createIterator(...).new IteratorNode() {...} return different results

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2622. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.3.0 Assignee: Claus Ibsen trunk: 931494.

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2616) RedeliveryErrorHandler - Add option to let delayed Exchange be non blocked

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58692#action_58692 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2616: No Spring Transaction requires to use same thread

[HEADS UP] Camel Security

Hi, I just added a design notes[1] for the Camel Security which shows a rough design of Camel Security API, which just leverage the Camel Policy API to delegate the access control to the AuthorizationPolicy. In this way we can plugin different AuthoriztionPolicy implementation based on

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

+1! On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Camel+Securit Johan Edstrom j...@opennms.org They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin, Historical

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2613) CamelProxy - Add option to treat void methods as InOnly for fire and forget style messaging

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=58698#action_58698 ] Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2613: {code} davsclaus:(svn)camel[trunk:931578]/$ svn

[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2613) CamelProxy - Add option to treat void methods as InOnly for fire and forget style messaging

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2613. Resolution: Won't Fix trunk: 931612. CamelProxy - Add option to treat void methods as InOnly

[jira] Created: (CAMEL-2624) support for async responses on single tcp connection

support for async responses on single tcp connection Key: CAMEL-2624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2624 Project: Apache Camel Issue Type: Improvement

Re: [jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2536) Improved quickfix component

No, I already checked it out but was not able to find it. I'll mail the office again. Claus Ibsen-2 wrote: Hi Can you find your name in this page? http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html#unlistedclas On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:41 AM, beat glattfelder b...@glattfelder.com

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

Hi Willem Looks great. Only think is that I wonder if introducing another schema (spring/security) in Camel. Is it entirely spring-security based? Maybe the schema should be named to reflect this to avoid it being a _general_ security schema for Camel. etc name it (spring/spring-security) if it

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

Hi Claus, My comments are in the mail. Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Willem Looks great. Only think is that I wonder if introducing another schema (spring/security) in Camel. Is it entirely spring-security based? Maybe the schema should be named to reflect this to avoid it being a _general_

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Willem Jiang willem.ji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Claus, My comments are in the mail. Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Willem Looks great. Only think is that I wonder if introducing another schema (spring/security) in Camel. Is it entirely spring-security based?

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

Hi Willem, I like that. One additional thing I could imagine is to have an AOP style for applying policies to endpoints. For example, instead of writing a policy() directly into the route one could have: // access control DSL (AOP style) enforce(adminPolicy).at(direct:myEndpoint) // route

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

+1 for leveraging the standard Java security APIs for authentication. This would also fit nicely with authentication mechanisms of JEE containers. Am 08.04.2010 07:03, schrieb Claus Ibsen: On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Willem Jiangwillem.ji...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Claus, My comments

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Martin Krasser d...@martin-krasser.de wrote: Hi Willem, I like that. One additional thing I could imagine is to have an AOP style for applying policies to endpoints. For example, instead of writing a policy() directly into the route one could have: //

Re: [HEADS UP] Camel Security

Am 08.04.2010 07:18, schrieb Claus Ibsen: On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Martin Krasserd...@martin-krasser.de wrote: Hi Willem, I like that. One additional thing I could imagine is to have an AOP style for applying policies to endpoints. For example, instead of writing a policy()