[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

2011-03-15 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006850#comment-13006850 ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-3784: - Hi guys, this Jira is not dupli

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.7.0

2011-03-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Hadrian, did you rollback the 2.7.0 release ? On the trunk, I still have 2.8-SNAPSHOT version, so I guess it's not already done. I have some patches in preparation but I would like to generate the patches on the right version :) Thanks Regards JB On 03/11/2011 11:55 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006856#comment-13006856 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3784: - No, this issue is not related to the feature fi

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

2011-03-15 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006860#comment-13006860 ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-3784: - I'm not talking about the featu

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3784) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1.v20110307

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006866#comment-13006866 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3784: - We can't upgrade Jetty to 7.3.1 until a new ver

Re: [PROPOSAL]

2011-03-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all, FYI, I fixed KARAF-505 this morning. Karaf 2.1.5 will support the resolver="(obr)" notation. Regards JB On 03/11/2011 07:07 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: We knew this patch will go in, now or 2.8.0 which meant that the compatibility with karaf 2.1.x will be broken at some point. There i

[jira] Closed: (CAMEL-3767) Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1

2011-03-15 Thread Claus Ibsen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Claus Ibsen closed CAMEL-3767. -- Resolution: Duplicate Assignee: Claus Ibsen Duplicate of CAMEL-3784 > Upgrade to Jetty 7.3.1 > -

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006905#comment-13006905 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3763: - I just ran the itest-osgi-karaf with the latest

Re: [PROPOSAL]

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang
I just ran the itest-osgi-karaf with the latest patch, and found current PaxExam doesn't support to load two features with different versions or load the features from other features file, so current camel osgi integration tests doesn't work with the patched camel-feature. I'm not sure how the

Re: [PROPOSAL]

2011-03-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Willem, thanks for your tests. I'm gonna check your issue (I will discuss with you on IRC around that). Regards JB On 03/15/2011 02:18 PM, Willem Jiang wrote: I just ran the itest-osgi-karaf with the latest patch, and found current PaxExam doesn't support to load two features with differen

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006912#comment-13006912 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3763: - I just added mvn:org.apache.karaf.assemblies.f

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

2011-03-15 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006916#comment-13006916 ] Jean-Baptiste Onofré commented on CAMEL-3763: - You don't need the repository t

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006912#comment-13006912 ] Willem Jiang edited comment on CAMEL-3763 at 3/15/11 1:48 PM: --

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-3763) Update Camel features descriptor to be Karaf 2.2.0 compliant

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-3763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006922#comment-13006922 ] Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-3763: - @JB, As I can't run the osgi integration test o

Re: [PROPOSAL]

2011-03-15 Thread Andreas Pieber
Hey Willem, JB, If I understand you correctly this problem should only affect 2.2.x branch but not the master. The problem should be, AFAIK that we use pax-exam 1.2.3 in karaf-2.2 which uses an old version of karaf. I'll upgrade 2.2.x to exam 1.2.4. Can you please check if this fixes your problems

Advice for CAMEL-3476

2011-03-15 Thread Christian Müller
Hello dev! I would like to get an advice from your for [1]. I would prefer to implement the AWS SNS component to "only" provide a producer (which sends notification to the AWS SNS topic). In my opinion, the user should be responsible to configure the subscription for this topic (outside of Camel

Re: [PROPOSAL]

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Andreas, I updated the camel itest-osgi-karaf to use Pax-Exam 1.2.4, it looks like current pax-exam doesn't support the new features of Karaf-2.2.0. As karaf stand feature has more than on Spring feature, it's hard to let the pax-exam to tell which version of feature it should load. So the

Re: Advice for CAMEL-3476

2011-03-15 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Christian, It looks like the subscription can be implemented as a connector. In this way user could configure the connector as they want and your SNS component could be free to this kind detail message. If you take a look at camel-jms component, it resolve the same question by setting the