A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
305 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-137/
The tarballs are here
https://repository.apache.org/cont
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Ok, let's redo it then. It's only one extra day. If there are any other
> fixes that need to go in and I should wait for please let me know. Other
> than that it'd be good to avoid any commits that are larger in scope.
>
> I'll wait a couple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-4585.
Resolution: Fixed
> Upgrade to Quickfix/J 1.5.1
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kulp resolved CAMEL-4604.
Resolution: Fixed
> Upgrade to CXF 2.5.0
>
>
> Key: CAMEL-
Upgrade to CXF 2.5.0
Key: CAMEL-4604
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4604
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Daniel Kulp
Assignee: Daniel Kulp
Fix For: 2.9.0
Messages after a split() should not keep attachments
Key: CAMEL-4603
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4603
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: came
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jonathan Anstey resolved CAMEL-4599.
Resolution: Fixed
> Add default for transactionName in camel-jms
>
Changed the thread to [discuss]. I propose dropping the attachments in
the split messages. It's kinda awkward imho to split a message into
smaller messages but still keep the attachments. I can hardly imagine a
scenario where the attachments are needed and I think it's more of an
edge case.
I
Ok, let's redo it then. It's only one extra day. If there are any other
fixes that need to go in and I should wait for please let me know. Other
than that it'd be good to avoid any commits that are larger in scope.
I'll wait a couple of hours for other opinions and unless anybody thinks
otherw
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
> As in the previous RC there are 2 snapshot versions used in the karaf
> features that are not yet released by the SMX project.
>
> * cometd-java-server-bundle=2.3.1_1-SNAPSHOT
> * quickfix-bundle=1.5.1_1-SNAPSHOT
>
I have asked Jean to pu
I think it should be OK, if we add a release note for it.
And We can fix it in the GA which will be out in few weeks.
On Tue Nov 1 21:02:09 2011, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
As in the previous RC there are 2 snapshot versions used in the karaf
features that are not yet released by the SMX project.
As in the previous RC there are 2 snapshot versions used in the karaf
features that are not yet released by the SMX project.
* cometd-java-server-bundle=2.3.1_1-SNAPSHOT
* quickfix-bundle=1.5.1_1-SNAPSHOT
Given the fact that this is not the final 2.9.0 release, I think it
should be ok and it
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0-RC1 (2nd attempt)
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:09:41 -0400
From: Hadrian Zbarcea
Reply-To: priv...@camel.apache.org
To: priv...@camel.apache.org
A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0-RC1 is out with approximately
3
file/ftp consumer - The filter option should be able to work on directories as
well
---
Key: CAMEL-4602
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4602
Project: Cam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Willem Jiang reassigned CAMEL-4600:
---
Assignee: Willem Jiang
> Improve URISupport.sanitizeUri and apply it in additional places
15 matches
Mail list logo