Re: Camel 2.9.0 -- StackOverflowError initializing route with otherwise() clause

2011-12-30 Thread Willem Jiang
I just tried a simple unit test[1] with the route you showed on the trunk, I did get the StackOverflowError, Can I know more information about how you deploy the route and the version of you JDK, OSGi container? [1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1226037&view=rev Willem On Sat Dec 31 01:45:0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0

2011-12-30 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi Christian, I don't think the old code works with Camel 2.8.x is a right solution. I just committed a quick unit test to show the right way of using properties in simple expression[1]. BTW, it works with Camel 2.9.0. [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1226032&view=rev On Fri Dec 30 23:51

Camel 2.9.0 -- StackOverflowError initializing route with otherwise() clause

2011-12-30 Thread ilopanj
Hi, I'm preparing to upgrade an application to 2.9.0 from 2.8.3 and found a problem initializing one of our existing routes defined with the Java DSL: from ("direct:outerRoute") .choice () .when(header("test-header").isNotNull()) .to("di

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.9.0

2011-12-30 Thread Christian Schneider
I spotted a regression when using {{properties}} in the simple language. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4843 I am wating with my vote to see if there is an easy workaround. Christian Am 28.12.2011 04:36, schrieb Hadrian Zbarcea: A new release candidate apache-camel-2.9.0 final

Re: Veto! (Re: svn commit: r1225170....)

2011-12-30 Thread Babak Vahdat
Thank you Claus! Babak Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 30.12.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Claus Ibsen : > Hi > > I have polished the java doc. > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Babak Vahdat > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> for the sake of completness of my previous post [1] is the class which still >> clai

Re: Veto! (Re: svn commit: r1225170....)

2011-12-30 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I have polished the java doc. On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > Hi, > > for the sake of completness of my previous post [1] is the class which still > claims to be a Processor! > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/cam

Re: Whats about a camel-all feature

2011-12-30 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Do we test to install each feature? > > I wonder why we did not catch the problem with some modules not loading. I think the camel-itest-karaf does install some of the jaxb stuff and whatnot that camel-cxf does. Or the fact we may hav

Re: Veto! (Re: svn commit: r1225170....)

2011-12-30 Thread Babak Vahdat
Hi, for the sake of completness of my previous post [1] is the class which still claims to be a Processor! [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/util/CamelLogger.java -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Veto-Re

Re: Whats about a camel-all feature

2011-12-30 Thread Christian Schneider
Do we test to install each feature? I wonder why we did not catch the problem with some modules not loading. Christian Am 30.12.2011 11:02, schrieb Claus Ibsen: On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: Hi Christian, I don´t think that would help much. Our recent problem

Re: Whats about a camel-all feature

2011-12-30 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I don´t think that would help much. Our recent problem where some > dependencies where missing would > not have shown in a camel-all feature as in sum they were there. For users > it is also not practical as installing