On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> +1
> We have at least one user waiting for it...
>
+1
Yay a real end user ;)
Let me get this last outstanding ticket resolved
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4904
Then we should be good for a 2.8.4 release.
> Best,
> Chr
+1
We have at least one user waiting for it...
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/18/2012 05:49 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>>
>> It's been 2 months since 2.8.3 and thus we're slightly overdue. With the
>> holiday
+1
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 01/18/2012 05:49 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
It's been 2 months since 2.8.3 and thus we're slightly overdue. With the
holidays in there, though, kind of understandable.
In anycase, I'm planning on building/releasing new versions of CXF later this
week. Thus, early next we
It's been 2 months since 2.8.3 and thus we're slightly overdue. With the
holidays in there, though, kind of understandable.
In anycase, I'm planning on building/releasing new versions of CXF later this
week. Thus, early next week may be a good time to build and release 2.8.4.
If you have mo
Eclipse? :)
+1 - sure.
On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:45 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Babak,
>
> to be honest I don't care as I don't use Eclipse ;)
> So you have my +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/17/2012 05:19 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> couple of weeks ago I had a long mail convers
On Tuesday, January 17, 2012 8:31:06 AM Babak Vahdat wrote:
> BTW Dan has already fixed the issue I've mentioned by the camel pom itself
> [1]. However I don't get why we've got the same eclipse stuff in [2] again.
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1229568
> [2] https://s
Hi Babak,
you are right, I use IntelliJ IDEA, and the project settings are up to date.
Regards
JB
On 01/18/2012 11:34 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote:
Hi Jean,
Thanks for your feedback! So I assume you make use of the IntelliJ (and not
NetBeans IDE :-)).
As far as I see [1] is the only piece of the c
Hi Jean,
Thanks for your feedback! So I assume you make use of the IntelliJ (and not
NetBeans IDE :-)).
As far as I see [1] is the only piece of the cake we've got there for the
IntelliJ folks and inside there nothing is touched/overridden regarding the
compiler settings, so we should be fine the
