Good morning
Not sure if I'm missing anything here about the requested feature but I
think there's no extra feature/functionality we should provide for this
as that's already given out of the box through the JAXB's own *public*
API:
See the Javadoc examples here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/
Good morning
Not sure if I'm missing anything here about the requested feature but I
think there's no extra feature/functionality we should provide for this
as that's already given out of the box through the JAXB's own *public*
API:
See the Javadoc examples here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/
Hi Dan,
reading through the following lines:
> In the integration space, we kind of have to expect and support various
> levels of integration with various technologies.
I do completely agree with you, BUT
> Different users will be trying to integrate with different versions of
> things
> and
Hi again,
Just found that we've got exactly the same thing here as well (since ages):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/trunk/components/camel-web/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/web/util/JAXBMarshallerResolver.java
Which came through:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-2280
Babak
Hi
I installed the Java7 update 4 on my windows xp box.
And gave the latest source code a test spin
Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 18:31:09+0100)
Maven home: E:\maven\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_04, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: E:\jdk1.7.0_04\jre
Default locale: en_GB, platform
Good catch!
I will write a test which proves this. If it works, I will revert my
changes for this issue.
Best,
Christian
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Babak Vahdat
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Just found that we've got exactly the same thing here as well (since ages):
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/
We ran into the same thing with CXF a long time ago. It's also a bit more
complex than just referencing the NamespaceMapper class. The "key" that is
used to set it into the context is also different with the built in version
of JAXB as even the "key" gets the ".internal" into it.
For CXF,
Done.
Thanks again Babak for the hint.
Best,
Christian
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Christian Müller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good catch!
>
> I will write a test which proves this. If it works, I will revert my
> changes for this issue.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
>
> On Fri, May
Could you share your test with us which shows your solution works?
I'm wondering because in JMS there is no equivalent for attachments... If
you send a message with attachments to ActiveMQ, I'm afraid you will lose
your attachments...
Best,
Christian
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bernard Ligny
