Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 (non-binding) Aki 2012/6/28 Hadrian Zbarcea : > A new release candidate apache-camel-2.10.0 final is out with approximately > 483 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-2

Re: Fixed broken camel-hibernate build

+1 Thanks for reporting and fixing. Best, Christian On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Henryk Konsek wrote: > > Will do it later... > > Great, thanks. > > -- > Henryk Konsek > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new release candidate apache-camel-2.10.0 final is out with > approximately 483 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 Babak -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-0-2nd-attempt-tp5715199p5715298.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [DISCUSS] Should camel enforce usage of proper URIs?

Perfect, fully agree. To rephrase (and reorder). 1. We tell users that these are not really URIs. 2. Users need to encode. 3. Change components and redesign URIs to make them valid. I'll comment on these below. Well, there aren't many solutions. Either users need to encode uri or we need to ch

Re: Fixed broken camel-hibernate build

> Will do it later... Great, thanks. -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com

Re: [DISCUSS] Should camel enforce usage of proper URIs?

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Seriously Guillaume? > > You may have noticed that *this* [discuss] thread was opened 8 days > *prior* to the vote. Initially that very few commented on. It's just that I > learned history all to well to know how lazy consensus works in th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 Tested with Camel in Action source. Gave a number of the examples from the kit a test spin. Also on Karaf 2.2.8. And the doc manuals now has the 2.10.0 version number. The README.txt in the root has some very long line separators (eg ) On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea w

Re: [DISCUSS] Should camel enforce usage of proper URIs?

Seriously Guillaume? You may have noticed that *this* [discuss] thread was opened 8 days *prior* to the vote. Initially that very few commented on. It's just that I learned history all to well to know how lazy consensus works in this community. Honestly, I think that was not very well com

Re: [DISCUSS] Should camel enforce usage of proper URIs?

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Christian, I agree, but it's already done. Camel has that already, it's a > method called preProcessUri. > > However, while I fully agree that encoding is ugly I will remind everybody > that one of Camel's goals is to make integration simp

Re: Fixed broken camel-hibernate build

Will do it later... Sent from a mobile device Am 29.06.2012 14:23 schrieb "Henryk Konsek" : > Hi, > > The camel-hibernate build was broken. Apparently nobody has built it > for a while since changes of ${hibernate-version} from camel-parent > required camel-hibernate pom to be updated as well. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Should camel enforce usage of proper URIs?

Christian, I agree, but it's already done. Camel has that already, it's a method called preProcessUri. However, while I fully agree that encoding is ugly I will remind everybody that one of Camel's goals is to make integration simple! Forcing users to encode uris is definitely not helping. My

Re: Camel-Extra 2.10 release

> The only thing I (or someone else) has to figure out is how we signe our > artifacts and to which repo we want to upload it. I'll take a look at this but before that I need to deal with broken camel-hibernate build. -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Twitter: iocanel *

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 (non-binding) regards, Achim 2012/6/29 Gary Tully : > +1 > > On 28 June 2012 03:39, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> A new release candidate apache-camel-2.10.0 final is out with approximately >> 483 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. >> >> Please find the staging repo here: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.10.0 (2nd attempt)

+1 On 28 June 2012 03:39, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > A new release candidate apache-camel-2.10.0 final is out with approximately > 483 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1]. > > Please find the staging repo here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-2