On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> Thanks Adam for this pointer.
> I respond to this thread with an optimized version of the Camel route which
> is about two times faster than the Spring integration solution.
>
Btw the default request/reply with Camel JMS is using tempora
But is it better?
On Jul 15, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
> Thanks Adam for this pointer.
> I respond to this thread with an optimized version of the Camel route which
> is about two times faster than the Spring integration solution.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 201
Thanks Adam for this pointer.
I respond to this thread with an optimized version of the Camel route which
is about two times faster than the Spring integration solution.
Best,
Christian
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 4:52 AM, aedwards wrote:
>
> http://forum.springsource.org/showthread.php?128152-Spri
Hi
When using a reply queue its shared by default, so you would need to
specify replyToType=Exclusive to mark the reply queue as exclusive to
this particular Camel consumer. And then its much faster.
I gave the sample code a test run on my laptop. The only change i did
was to mark it as exclusive
Christian Müller wrote on Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 00:43:23 +0200:
> Thanks Daniel for the quick answer.
>
> I would like to show you the bounce email, but I didn't get one (I SUPPOSE
> Google/Codespot doesn't forward the bounce mail to the project admins).
> And because the mail doesn't received our
