The vote passes with:
[7] +1 (hadrian, joed, jgenender, rajdavies, cschneider, dkulp, cmueller)
[1] +1 (non-binding)
[0] -1
I will finish publishing the artifacts this evening and make the
announcement in the morning after they're pushed to the mirrors.
Thanks to all who tested this release a
The vote passes with:
[4] +1 (hadrian, dkulp, cschneider, cmueller)
[1] +1 (non-binding)
[0] -1
I will finish publishing the artifacts this evening and make the
announcement in the morning after they're pushed to the mirrors.
Thanks to all who tested this release and voted.
Hadrian
On 10/1
> I think this is what most of the people will expect as package name.
I agree that "apacheextra" (single e) is better since it corresponds
to the groupId. Although "apachextras" (double e) is a valid domain
name, it confuses people :) .
+1 for renaming Java package to "double e" notation i.e. ap
In summary and to close out:
* Post to Camel User
Please use the Camel User mailing list for usage questions and issues.
* JBoss Issue:
Within JBoss you willhave better success using the JBoss Snowdrop
project. There are a number of threads that discuss using it on the
forums and on google. D
Hello,
After speaking to Christian S., I don't think including these 2 fixes is
valid rationale to roll back the release at this point. So let me switch my
vote to +1. Apologies for the misunderstanding!
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel Committer
Enterprise Architect, Program Manager, Open
+1
I run the camel-in-action test suite (rev. 337).
I had to update camelinaction.RiderAutoPartsCallbackTest.testCallback() to
get all tests pass. I think it's only a timing issue.
Best,
Christian
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new patch release candidate apache-ca
I would argue must of the people overlooked this - at least me...
The domain [1] also redirects to [2] which means it's also valid. And if I
strip the "-" from "apache-extras" I get "apacheextra"... ;-)
I think this is what most of the people will expect as package name.
Other opinions?
[1] http:
+1
I could update and build camel-in-action without any problem.
Best,
Christian
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> A new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.9.4 final is out with
> approximately 71 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>
> Please fin
+1.
Raúl.
On 14 Oct 2012 15:22, "Christian Schneider" wrote:
> +1
>
> Christian
>
> On 10/11/2012 03:09 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>
>> A new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.9.4 final is out with
>> approximately 55 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
>>
>> Please find
+1
Christian
On 10/11/2012 03:09 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
A new patch release candidate apache-camel-2.9.4 final is out with
approximately 55 issues resolved so far: improvements and bug fixes [1].
Please find the staging repo here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac
+1
Tested with my camel tutorials together with Karaf. Also tested on TESB
which incorporated the latest 2.10 snapshot before the release.
I had a some test errors when I compiled the 2.10.2 tag though.
There were some errors in the mail tests but I think they are more test
related so no need
11 matches
Mail list logo
