Hi Benjamin,
Your icla has been recorded. You didn't need to attach the confirmation
email, we have the means to verify (and we always do). I granted you the
necessary karma.
Thanks for your contribution,
Hadrian
On 12/07/2012 03:44 AM, Benjamin Habegger wrote:
Hello all,
Just to let you
I can do it tomorrow. I'm travelling right now...
Best,
Christian
Sent from a mobile device
Am 07.12.2012 09:45 schrieb "Benjamin Habegger" :
> Hello all,
>
> Just to let you know that my ICLA has just been filed. I sent in a patch
> (cf. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5843) and wou
Hello all,
Just to let you know that my ICLA has just been filed. I sent in a patch
(cf. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-5843) and would be happy
to complete the wiki to document it.
Can someone do the necessary for me to have acces to it ?
Best wishes,
Benjamin
-- Forwarded
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> What you suggest is really interesting and could be added to the existing
> aggregator if we add some properties and global cache to inform the
> aggregator that it will receive exchanges from different input. But the
> q
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> It would be great to improve the Aggregator to support a completion size
> which evaluates ALL exchanges (from all different aggregates).
> We ofter have the requirement to split a file which contains items which we
> process independently
Hi Christian,
What you suggest is really interesting and could be added to the existing
aggregator if we add some properties and global cache to inform the
aggregator that it will receive exchanges from different input. But the
question is "Is it still the role of the aggregator of doing that inst
