camel pull request: CAMEL-6057: Fix for accessing beans from parent context...

2013-02-09 Thread tivv
GitHub user tivv opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/10 CAMEL-6057: Fix for accessing beans from parent context by type You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/tivv/camel trunk Alternatively you c

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-02-09 Thread Bilgin Ibryam
The redis component documentation is done, including a blog post about it http://www.ofbizian.com/2013/02/apache-camel-meets-redis.html Cheers Bilgin On 6 February 2013 16:03, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote: > Maybe a table (feature x option): > > Feature||| > Option | F1 | F2 | description >

Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.10.4 and 2.9.6 releases

2013-02-09 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Claus, there is :). It's the -P validate profile in platforms/karaf/features that caught it. Yeah the cxf 2.6.6 features are pretty much unusable. I am sure Dan will do something about it. Instead of reverting to 2.6.5 there is also the option of copying the relevant features from cxf to camel

Re: svn commit: r1444236 - /camel/branches/camel-2.10.x/components/camel-msv/pom.xml

2013-02-09 Thread Babak Vahdat
Am 09.02.13 09:12 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" unter : >Should this commit also be done on trunk and 2.9 branch? Hi Hadrian I've got no clue what exact test failure you were facing with camel-msv. Building it multiple times on my box I did not encounter any problems before this dependency upgrade. Al

Re: svn commit: r1444236 - /camel/branches/camel-2.10.x/components/camel-msv/pom.xml

2013-02-09 Thread Claus Ibsen
Should this commit also be done on trunk and 2.9 branch? On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:55 PM, wrote: > Author: hadrian > Date: Fri Feb 8 20:55:43 2013 > New Revision: 1444236 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1444236 > Log: > Upgrade xsdlib version and to fix test failure in camel-msv > > Modified: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.10.4 and 2.9.6 releases

2013-02-09 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Fixed the msv issue and hit another one. Looks like the > apache-cxf-2.6.6-features.xml [1] is invalid: ${cxf.james.mim4j.version} is > not resolved :(. > Ah darn. CXF 2.6.5 does not have that issue, so in worst case we can revert to this v