Re: Wiki question

2013-10-14 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Preben.Asmussen wrote: > Hi > > I have create a component page at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Splunk for the splunk > component. > > At the bottom of the page I reference some features in Splunk (jmx app.) > that is not part of the component

Re: SJMS implementation - Batch Consumer

2013-10-14 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
That I agree with which I believe is the aggregator issue u brought forward, correct? If so why don't u go ahead and open a Jira ticket describing the issue so we can capture the relevant details. ses > On Oct 14, 2013, at 8:36 AM, flovansi wrote: > > Yes I understand the purpose of the t

Wiki question

2013-10-14 Thread Preben.Asmussen
Hi I have create a component page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Splunk for the splunk component. At the bottom of the page I reference some features in Splunk (jmx app.) that is not part of the component itself, but could be useful for users. Is that ok, or would that be r

Re: SJMS implementation - Batch Consumer

2013-10-14 Thread flovansi
Yes I understand the purpose of the timeout but what if an exchange has just been read by the SJMS consumer and the timeout is triggered? The processing of the timeout commits the transaction while the exchange could still be inflight and could fail. In general, the commit of the transaction trigg

Re: SJMS implementation - Batch Consumer

2013-10-14 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Hi Flo, Thanks for putting this together. The timeout is working as expected but I will see if I can make it work with this to create an automated test that handles the aggregation issue. Thanks again, Scott ES On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 2:51 AM, flovansi wrote: > These tests requires manual int

Re: SJMS implementation - Batch Consumer

2013-10-14 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Hi Flo, The completion of the batch value has a higher priortity than the timeout. Therefore the batch should always complete the expected number. The timeout is meant to keep the consumer from starving. Say you have a batch of 100 and only 50 msgs are produced. We don't want the transaction b

Re: Build failures...

2013-10-14 Thread Babak Vahdat
Yeah you're right the test failed again on the CI-Server as well. There're also couple of unresolved concurrency/deadlock related JIRA tickets by OpenJPA going into the exactly same direction: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-1716 Babak Christian Mueller wrote > It's still failing

Re: wiki karma

2013-10-14 Thread Claus Ibsen
Karma granted. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Preben.Asmussen wrote: > Hi > > Can anybody grand me karma to edit the wiki for user preben. > ICLA signed and accepted. > > Best, > Preben Asmussen > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/wiki-karma-tp57414

Re: SJMS implementation - Batch Consumer

2013-10-14 Thread flovansi
These tests requires manual intervention (looking if messages are still in the queue or are they committed?). But these are simple tests that proves the batch transaction support offered by SJMS is not 100% correct (especially the behaviour of the timeout!!!). -- View this message in context:

wiki karma

2013-10-14 Thread Preben.Asmussen
Hi Can anybody grand me karma to edit the wiki for user preben. ICLA signed and accepted. Best, Preben Asmussen -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/wiki-karma-tp5741499.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.