Willem.Jiang wrote
> No, as the CI build was broken for a while, the latest Camel 2.14-SNAPSHOT
> was built about 2 month ago.
> You can try to run some tests with Camel 2.14.0-SNAPSHOT for verification.
>
> On September 16, 2014 at 11:05:55 PM, Matt Raible (
> matt@
> ) wrote:
>> Should everyth
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.2.13.x.notest (build #63)
Status: Fixed
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.2.13.x.notest/63/
to view the results.
It certainly makes it easy to find in google searches!
On 16 September 2014 09:48, brian.curnow wrote:
> I ran across documentation on the Apache Camel Transaction Clients
> (http://camel.apache.org/transactional-client.html), this
> documentation has a link to an FAQ entry entitled "What is a C
If the request is SOAP based and you validate the request against an XML
schema, CXF can already do that. No processor needed for this requirement.
To transform between different types/objects, I recommend to use the Camel
TypeConverter mechanism [1] and implement your own type converters. No
proce
+1
Just verified the Endpoint *.html documentations inside the bundles
camel-core, camel-ftp and camel-jms which all look good.
Babak
Willem.Jiang wrote
> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.14.0, a major release coming
> with about 399 issues fixed.
>
> Release notes:
> 2.14.0
>
Hello Ayache!
Welcome in the Apache Camel community.
Now you should have the karma to edit the Camel WIKI pages. We are looking
forward to your contributions.
Best,
Christian
-
Software Integration Specialist
Apache Member
V.P. Apache Camel | Apache Camel PMC Member | Apache Cam
No, as the CI build was broken for a while, the latest Camel 2.14-SNAPSHOT was
built about 2 month ago.
You can try to run some tests with Camel 2.14.0-SNAPSHOT for verification.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jn
Should everything be the same as Camel 2.14-SNAPSHOT? I've been using the
SNAPSHOT release for months and haven't had any issues. However, when I
switch to 2.14.0, I get a couple test failures.
For example, here's one of them:
@Test
public void lookupByMemberId() throws Exception
I ran across documentation on the Apache Camel Transaction Clients
(http://camel.apache.org/transactional-client.html), this
documentation has a link to an FAQ entry entitled "What is a Camel
TOE" (http://camel.apache.org/what-is-a-camel-toe.html). I would like
to request that this page be removed
GitHub user larochef opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/266
[CAMEL-7827] Add possibility to specify parameters to URLs using http api.
Added the replacement in CxfRsProducer + unit test to validate it
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user nathanwray closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/265
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Hi Antoine,
if you plan to merge your change on version previous to 2.14, you have
to use Java6.
Regards
JB
On 09/15/2014 10:15 AM, Antoine DESSAIGNE wrote:
Hi Claus,
From now on, we can use the java7 features in the code ?
(try-with-resource, etc...)
Antoine.
2014-09-13 7:35 GMT+02:00 C
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 09/15/2014 01:56 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.14.0, a major release coming
with about 399 issues fixed.
Release notes:
2.14.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12326054&styleName=Html&projectId=123
Does anyone have an answer. Please reply it will be very helpful.
Thanks & Regards,
Subbu.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Best-Practice-to-write-Processor-tp5756514p5756554.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
+1 (non-binding)
regards, aki
2014-09-16 4:17 GMT+02:00 Willem Jiang :
> I ran the test with camel inaction and camel cookbook codes. All tests were
> passed after I updated the codes.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> Willem Jiang
>
> Red Hat, Inc.
> Web: http://www.redhat.com
> Blog: http://willemj
15 matches
Mail list logo