Hi Subbu,
Processor is basic build block of Camel route, each route has bunch of chained
processors to do the EIP work. When you add a processor, camel will add trace,
error handler interceptors to wrap the processor for you. These interceptor
just add some method call stack, and it doesn't cos
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.2.13.x.notest (build #68)
Status: Still Failing
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.2.13.x.notest/68/
to view the results.
Hi Claus,
I checked the module class JsonDataFormat. As it just provide common option
settings for json-xstream, json-jackson and json-gson, I’m afraid I cannot add
enableJaxbAnnotation option there.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot
Github user wuwen5 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/272
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
I can add an option to cxfrs endpoint to avoid sending the payload in DELETE
method. In this way, we could keep old behaviour of CxfProducer unchanged by
default.
Any thoughts?
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://j
Hi Dan, Willem
On 24/09/14 14:37, Daniel Kulp wrote:
That’s likely a different issue. Nt sure the parameter should be added as
part of the body in this case as part of the consumer. I’d defer that to
Sergey, but certainly the CxfProducer needs to be able to send a DELETE with a
payload.
I
That’s likely a different issue. Nt sure the parameter should be added as
part of the body in this case as part of the consumer. I’d defer that to
Sergey, but certainly the CxfProducer needs to be able to send a DELETE with a
payload.
Dan
On Sep 24, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
Actually, this patch is try to avoid sending the message body with the DELETE
method if camel proxy the request just like this
As camel-cxfrs consumer put the invocation parameters into the camel message
body, the proxy just add the message body 124 like this
2014-09-24 21:00:19,378 [q
Well, that works just fine then. Go for it!
On 23 September 2014 16:19, Christian Müller
wrote:
> I would avoid to OSGIfied jruby-core and jruby-stdlib because
> jruby-complete is already an OSGI bundle.
> I will update to jruby-complete when 1.7.16 is available.
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
GitHub user camann9 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/278
Post processing action for input mail box
This patch adds the possibility to specify a post processing action for
camel input mail boxes. This can be used for example to clean up the mail box
after
GitHub user camann9 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/277
Add capability to sort incoming mail messages
Camel should have the ability to sort incoming mail messages. This patch
adds that ability. There is one caveat:
POP3 does not support sorting and fo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/276
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
GitHub user wuwen5 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/276
CAMEL-7835:Camel listener with the Ordered
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/wuwen5/camel CAMEL-7835-Ordered
Alternatively you can
Hi,
Indeed - we've had several users complaining they can not use CXF Http
clients to use DELETE and the body against the legacy servers written to
expect DELETE and the body.
Enforcing the best practice at the component level would inevitably make
this component less practical, it should be m
Willem,
My reading of the discussion is that a DELETE MAY contain a message body, but
the semantics are somewhat undefined. A proxy SHOULD forward that body on.
This commit seems to make sure it doesn’t forward it along.Thus, I’m kind
of against this commit.
We also had a discussion a
Github user wuwen5 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/273
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Hi
You need to set a new option as well in the model class, so people can
configure it from xml dsl tool.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:02 AM, wrote:
> Repository: camel
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 46ef7cd52 -> cff3b1174
>
>
> CAMEL-7858 Allow to disable Jaxb annotations in JacksonDa
17 matches
Mail list logo