Github user stijnvanbael closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/471
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user oscerd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/496
CAMEL-8664 Update MongoDB Java Driver from 2.13.1 to 3.0.0
Hi everyone,
This PR is related to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-8664
Thanks.
Bye,
Andrea
You ca
I also agree that GitHub should be the home of Camel Extra.
Looking at the ComDev discussion it seems clear that different Apache Extra
projects have very different needs and purpose for why they exist.
Camel Extra needs to be available and invite contributions from developers.
The binary release
just my 2 cents, just crosspost the original mail to committ...@apache.org,
for me this is the right audience, because bigger ;-)
regards, Achim
2015-04-17 12:36 GMT+02:00 Sergey Beryozkin :
> Hi Raul
> On 17/04/15 11:30, Raul Kripalani wrote:
>
>> Hey Sergey,
>>
>> Do you mean memb...@apache.or
Hi Raul
On 17/04/15 11:30, Raul Kripalani wrote:
Hey Sergey,
Do you mean memb...@apache.org? I don't think I can post to that list as I
am not an ASF member.
Sorry, I did not know you could not post, I guess Camel leads should
work on that given your long time support for Camel :-)
But yeah,
You're right. Today GitHub is the first choice in every new open source project.
I hope they take the right decision.
On Friday, April 17, 2015 11:47 AM, Henryk Konsek
wrote:
They're considering SourceForge? Come on, guys... We have 2015, we should
use GitHub with the proper pull
Hey Sergey,
Do you mean memb...@apache.org? I don't think I can post to that list as I
am not an ASF member.
But yeah, even though TIBCO has used these arguments in the context of
ESBs, they are the typical set of FUD arguments vs OSS...
It would be cool to have a "wider" discussion... committ..
Excellent idea to it to github repo
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henryk Konsek
> wrote:
> > They're considering SourceForge? Come on, guys... We have 2015, we should
> > use GitHub with the proper pull requests, like the civilized comm
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Henryk Konsek wrote:
> They're considering SourceForge? Come on, guys... We have 2015, we should
> use GitHub with the proper pull requests, like the civilized communities do.
>
> I propose then to fallback to Google Code again until we know the
> final dev-commun
Hi Raul
Looks like Tibco is trying to prevent their customers from leaving with
this scary tactics :-)
I think if you post it to the Apache members list the email thread you
initiate will be the most popular in years :-)
Sergey
On 17/04/15 11:13, Raul Kripalani wrote:
Just found this marke
Just found this marketing landing page published on social networks. It's
made by TIBCO and attempts to highlight the downsides of Open Source ESBs.
You don't need to be a rocket scientist to gather what exact ESB they are
targeting (not us): just look at the images.
http://www.tibco.com/integrati
Hi,
I did small changes on camel-extra github repo,
We can drop it. I don't have google code account ( useless now :-) )
Greg I/O
Le vendredi 17 avril 2015 à 09:46 +, Henryk Konsek a écrit :
> They're considering SourceForge? Come on, guys... We have 2015, we should
> use GitHub with the p
The runner is nearly complete, before issuing a pull request, I'd like to
discuss a few ideas and also write some more tests.
I added short readme to my forked mirror of Camel so anyone who is willing
to participate in this discussion can quickly
see what's going on.
https://github.com/josefkarasek
They're considering SourceForge? Come on, guys... We have 2015, we should
use GitHub with the proper pull requests, like the civilized communities do.
I propose then to fallback to Google Code again until we know the
final dev-community decision is. @Greg, can you backport the changes you
committe
Hi Christian,
I can't push it to official camel (ASF vs. LGPL)
Camel-extra is the better place today.
It is why I started to move it to github.
Sorry I didn't notice all implications about moving.
Greg I/O
JBoss Middleware Consultant
twitter : @gautric_io
- Mail o
Yeah, we have to maintain raspberry-pi under Extra umbrella. Well, that
will motivate me to be the "Camel Extra release dude" again ;) .
pt., 17 kwi 2015 o 00:21 użytkownik Christian Mueller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> napisał:
> Greg,
>
> do you agree to move it to Camel extra? I'm asking bec
Oh, the static stuff... Thanks for pointing this, Christian. I guess I have
to give some love to camel-extra releases again then :) .
Cheers.
pt., 17 kwi 2015 o 00:16 użytkownik Christian Müller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> napisał:
> No, we cannot as discussed here [1].
>
> [1]
> http://camel
Github user oscerd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/494
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/493
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
GitHub user nkukhar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/495
[CAMEL-3552] Added PDF component to camel.
OK so this component ended up being quite bigger than I expected initially.
This is my first component so feel free to review and suggest any modifications.
20 matches
Mail list logo
