Camel.2.15.x.notest - Build # 95 - Failure

2015-07-18 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.2.15.x.notest (build #95) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.2.15.x.notest/95/ to view the results.

Camel.2.14.x.notest - Build # 178 - Failure

2015-07-18 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.2.14.x.notest (build #178) Status: Failure Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.2.14.x.notest/178/ to view the results.

[GitHub] camel pull request: Camel 8973

2015-07-18 Thread jkorab
Github user jkorab closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/565 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

Re: Apache Camel 2.15.3 release

2015-07-18 Thread Willem Jiang
There are some private setting of maven setting.xml and pgp private key for the releasing. If we can keep them out side of docker image, it should be OK to push the docker image into a public place. But for my experience, having a building box outside of China (without the protection of GFW) i

Re: Apache Camel 2.15.3 release

2015-07-18 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi, wouldn't a vagrant box be much better environment for this? Cause in the end you would want an interactive shell and not a single "process" to call. Just my 2 cents. Regards, Achim sent from mobile device Am 18.07.2015 12:05 nachm. schrieb "Claus Ibsen" : > Hi > > Yeah a docker image makes

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-7152

2015-07-18 Thread rbudzko
GitHub user rbudzko opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/566 CAMEL-7152 HttpProducer loses response data (specifically which hea…ders where returned): 1) Added copyHeaders to http and http4 components 2) Fixed some "online" tests which were outd

Re: Apache Camel 2.15.3 release

2015-07-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah a docker image makes sense - it can be setup to include the needed tools such as java / maven / pgp / bash / and other scripts and whatelse may be needed. On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Andrea Cosentino wrote: > From point of view a release base Docker image can be very useful, es

Re: Apache Camel 2.15.3 release

2015-07-18 Thread Andrea Cosentino
>From point of view a release base Docker image can be very useful, especially >to get an aseptic environment. We can do some tests and maybe open a new repository to push Dockerfile and all the related code. What do you think about? --  Andrea Cosentino  --  Apac