[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9493 - Improve shutdown of listener for ...

2016-01-11 Thread hqstevenson
GitHub user hqstevenson opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/763 CAMEL-9493 - Improve shutdown of listener for consumer You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/hqstevenson/camel CAMEL-9493 Alternat

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9430 : camel-braintree feature definitio...

2016-01-11 Thread lburgazzoli
GitHub user lburgazzoli opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/762 CAMEL-9430 : camel-braintree feature definition Add feature definition for amel-braintree component You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://githu

[GitHub] camel pull request: [CAMEL-9500] CamelVersionHelper cannot handle ...

2016-01-11 Thread tdiesler
GitHub user tdiesler opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/761 [CAMEL-9500] CamelVersionHelper cannot handle version qualifier You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/tdiesler/camel CAMEL-9500 Alter

Re: Camel 2.16.2 Release

2016-01-11 Thread Andrea Cosentino
Thanks Gregor, -- Andrea Cosentino - Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Monday, January 11, 2016 12:20 PM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: Hi Claus, Not a problem, I can cut the release next

Re: Camel 2.16.2 Release

2016-01-11 Thread Gregor Zurowski
Hi Claus, Not a problem, I can cut the release next week. Thanks, Gregor On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I am keeping an eye on the CI server to fix any test errors there, but > now it seems very good and only the usual non deterministic error may > happen. > > An

Re: Camel 2.16.2 Release

2016-01-11 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Okay the last CI build of 2.16.x all passed https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.2.16.x.fulltest/ On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I am keeping an eye on the CI server to fix any test errors there, but > now it seems very good and only the usual non deterministic