Re: Improve endpoint configuration

2016-03-24 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I do think there is some very good ideas in here. If we for Camel 3.0 can make those annotations mandatory and part of the auto configuration and validation of components. Today the annotations only play as a role of component documentation. You can remove the annotations and Camel at runtime

Duplicate values from csv are inserted to DB using Apache Camel

2016-03-24 Thread Sandy
0 down vote favorite I have a large chunk of CSV files(Each containing around millions of records). So I use seda to use the multi-threading feature. I split 5 in chunks, process it and get a List of Entity objects, which I want to split and persist to DB using jpa. Initially I was getting a Ou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.17.0 (Attempt #2)

2016-03-24 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 regards, aki 2016-03-22 13:48 GMT+01:00 Gregor Zurowski : > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.17.0, a new minor version > with ~450 improvements, fixes and new features. This is the second > attempt which fixes a NPE in camel-jaxb when used with > CamelTestBlueprint/OS

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.17.0 (Attempt #2)

2016-03-24 Thread Christian Müller
+1 camel-braintree is missing the license and notice file (I have added it) camel-etcd is missing the license and notice file (I have added it) camel-ironmq is missing the license and notice file (I have added it) camel-jcache is missing the license and notice file (I have added it) Best, Christi

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Raul Kripalani
Hey Guru, Nice ideas! Some thoughts inline. Cheers, Raúl. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Gnanaguru S wrote: > > Guys, > > These are some of the feature, I wish to see in upcoming camel versions. It > would be useful to have. > > 1. Timeout option in a internal synchronous endpoint - we very

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Raul Kripalani
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > There has been a camel-rx component for several years now, but nobody > has shown interest in it. Nor is people screaming in this community > about reactive libraries. In fact people rely on Camel being "not in > the forefront" > A camel-rx c

[GitHub] camel pull request: fix incorrect Time factory methods

2016-03-24 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/917 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: > Hi > > I'm not sure how the Camel Core actually looks like (especially the quality > and the ability to refactor or make more > complicated changes) but I had occasion to talk with some people using Camel > and trying to fix some issu

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Raul Kripalani
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak < krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think, the way to Camel 3 should also include the renovation of the Core > (if really necessary) or even rewriting and > making it more asynchronous, e.g. using rx.java (the later can be > eventually part

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Krzysztof Sobkowiak
Hi I'm not sure how the Camel Core actually looks like (especially the quality and the ability to refactor or make more complicated changes) but I had occasion to talk with some people using Camel and trying to fix some issues (and even saw some discussion in net about the state of Core) who thi

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Quinn Stevenson wrote: > I’d be happy to take a shot at the conversion. Is there an appropriate JIRA > created already? Or should I continue what you started on the osgi-trouble > branch? > I suggest to start a new branch. The osgi-trouble branch includes anot

[GitHub] camel pull request: fix incorrect Time factory methods

2016-03-24 Thread ErnestasMitkus
GitHub user ErnestasMitkus opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/917 fix incorrect Time factory methods Time#minutes(long) Time#hours(long) Time#days(long) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Quinn Stevenson
I’d be happy to take a shot at the conversion. Is there an appropriate JIRA created already? Or should I continue what you started on the osgi-trouble branch? > On Mar 24, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks for sharing the details about the bnd maven plugin. Sounds > pro

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks for sharing the details about the bnd maven plugin. Sounds promising if its more active maintained and is better. Anyone is surely welcome to give it a go on the Camel master branch. The build system is a bit complicated as there is some default stuff in parent pom.xml and some ant magi

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Quinn Stevenson
Antonin/Claus - I’ve used the bnd-maven-plugin, and it dramatically reduced the amount of configuration I had to do for my bundles. I hit a bug in maven-bundle-plugin (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-5179) and moving to the bnd-maven-plugin allowed me to what I needed to do. I eve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.17.0 (Attempt #2)

2016-03-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan > On Mar 22, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.17.0, a new minor version > with ~450 improvements, fixes and new features. This is the second > attempt which fixes a NPE in camel-jaxb when used with > CamelTestBluepri

Re: Improve endpoint configuration

2016-03-24 Thread lb
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, lb wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've been working on a number of components in the lates months and what I >> found >> a little bit repetitive is to handle endpoints configuration so I would like >> to >> know if ther

Re: Improve endpoint configuration

2016-03-24 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, lb wrote: > Hi, > > I've been working on a number of components in the lates months and what I > found > a little bit repetitive is to handle endpoints configuration so I would like > to > know if there is any interest about improving such area by adding > suppor

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Gnanaguru S
Guys, These are some of the feature, I wish to see in upcoming camel versions. It would be useful to have. 1. Timeout option in a internal synchronous endpoint - we very much use camel for orchestration layer. In a use case where many downstream routes/endpoints are called synchronously, I wou

[GitHub] camel pull request: Speed up InfinispanProducerTest

2016-03-24 Thread mgencur
Github user mgencur closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/915 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9750 : Tests should not log on stdout by...

2016-03-24 Thread lburgazzoli
Github user lburgazzoli closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/914 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9737 : add an option to configure defaul...

2016-03-24 Thread lburgazzoli
Github user lburgazzoli closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/916 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9737 : add an option to configure defaul...

2016-03-24 Thread lburgazzoli
GitHub user lburgazzoli opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/916 CAMEL-9737 : add an option to configure default resource to access You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/lburgazzoli/apache-camel C

[GitHub] camel pull request: Speed up InfinispanProducerTest

2016-03-24 Thread mgencur
GitHub user mgencur opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/915 Speed up InfinispanProducerTest The InfinispanProducerTest took about 2:42 mins before and now it takes about 13 seconds. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Andrea Cosentino
For the docs part, we are at almost half of the components in this moment. I hope we can finish them soon. -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix Committer Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: osce

Re: [DISCUSS] - Thoughts on Apache Camel 2.18 and towards 3.0

2016-03-24 Thread Antonin Stefanutti
Hi Claus, Just in case for info, there is apparently a new BND Maven plugin [1] that is supposed to alleviate some of the issues encountered with maven-bundle-plugin. I haven’t tried it (nor am knowledgeable in the area) but that may be good to know at some point for that piece of work. [1]: h

[GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-9750 : Tests should not log on stdout by...

2016-03-24 Thread lburgazzoli
GitHub user lburgazzoli opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/914 CAMEL-9750 : Tests should not log on stdout by default You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/lburgazzoli/apache-camel CAMEL-9750 A