Hi
The migration of the docs is already started with the components. We
are migrating them one by one which takes a rather long time to get
all done, but we do have a good start already.
Thee is docs in the src/doc folder of the components that has been
migrated, such as
https://github.com/apache
+1
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.16.3, a new patch release
> that includes 75+ fixes and improvements.
>
> Release notes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12334721&projectId=12311
+1 (binding).
Tested against personal projects.
Thanks Gregor!
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Sunday, April 3, 2016 9:28 PM, Gre
+1
Best,
Christian
Am 04.04.2016 13:57 schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> Hi
>
> Could any Camel committer take a look at that list.
>
> If nothing is heard by next week we will start delete them.
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Gregor Zurowski
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > It would be nice to remove these
:-)
Maybe the xml dsl could have it's own namespace like cxf.
Then you can import it and declare the hystrix stuff outside of the camel
context.
Wouldn't this solve having hystrix dependencies in camel core.
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/New-camel-h
Johan-
I'm a big fan of long winded statements as well, but not following this
one =)
Are you suggesting the current core architecture is problematic or that
a conversion to something like reactive would result in "strange" bugs?
Thanks,
Matt
On 4/4/16 10:52 AM, Johan Edstrom wrote:
I thi
On 4/4/16 11:12 AM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
The current website looks the same as it did when it was created:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070701184530/http://activemq.apache.org/camel/
I thought the Karaf guys did a nice job on the web
That was my exact same thought when I took a stab at the camel-hystrix
component myself:
https://github.com/apache/camel/commits/feature/camel-hystrix.
For me, Hystrix is not an endpoint but a mechanism to deal with failure, no
matter if thrown by an endpoint, a processor, or any other element of
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> The current website looks the same as it did when it was created:
>>
>> https://web.archive.org/web/20070701184530/http://activemq.apache.org/camel/
>>
> I thought the Karaf guys did a nice job on the website re-work. Is there a
> new base f
Hi bibryam
At first glance it looks a bit intrusive when the usual endpoints are
'wrapped' in the hystrix endpoint.
Could it be something like -> psudo code
http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint";>
.. other options
I think the core should focus on speed, consistency, reliability
and last extensibility; Camel has a nice traction but we don’t
want to see “strange” bugs from new features if that makes
sense as a long windy sentence…..
> On Apr 4, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/24/16
On 3/23/16 5:07 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
j)
Split camel-cxf into modules so we can separate WS and RS and also
spring vs blueprint. Today its big ball of dependencies that is a bit
hard to slice and dice. Specially for MSA style with REST and you dont
want to add in a bunch of extra not needed JARs
On 3/24/16 3:27 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
I think, the way to Camel 3 should also include the renovation of the Core
(if really necessary) or even rewriting and
making it more asynchronous, e.g. using rx.
On 3/24/16 3:55 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure how the Camel Core actually looks like (especially the quality and
the ability to refactor or make more
complicated changes) but I had occasion to talk with some people using Cam
Jakub-
Sign me up to help with this.
-Matt
On 3/23/16 9:22 AM, jkorab wrote:
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote
PS: We surely also need a better "what is Camel" story on the front
page. Its still that very first one with all the tech jumble that was
initially created.
I would be happy to write something up
Anyone who is actually using a remote branch will have a local copy
anyways. Stranded branches probably aren't being worked on anymore, either.
On 4 April 2016 at 07:09, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> No problem from me either.
>
> regards
> Grzegorz
>
> 2016-04-04 13:58 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino >
Github user thokuest closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/927
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
FYI,
I've pushed the camel-hystrix component to master.
Currently it doesn't support request collapsing and the threading
aspects needs more testing and possibly improving.
Here is a small example how the new component can be used:
https://github.com/bibryam/camel-hystrix-demo/blob/master/src/ma
No problem from me either.
regards
Grzegorz
2016-04-04 13:58 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino :
> No problem from my side.
>
> In my opinion we can remove them.
>
> Thanks!
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Member
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Service
No problem from my side.
In my opinion we can remove them.
Thanks!
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Monday, April 4, 2016 1:57 PM,
Hi
Could any Camel committer take a look at that list.
If nothing is heard by next week we will start delete them.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> +1
>
> It would be nice to remove these branches, including trunk and master-dev.
>
> Thanks,
> Gregor
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31
GitHub user thokuest opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/927
CAMEL-9808: SFTP: Enable configuration of bulk requests
This pull request makes it possible to configure the number of bulk
requests issued by JSch. Increasing the number of bulk requests may slight
On 01.04.2016 16:01, Quinn Stevenson wrote:
One clarification on the bnd-maven-plugin configuration - it will inherit
configuration from parent bnd.bnd files, so we can have the common
configuration we want in the top-level directory, and only override it when
needed.
Also - there are some “i
On 01.04.2016 09:17, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
I recently worked on some projects that also need OSGi settings and found an
interesting thing.
It seems the easiest way to get the exports, imports and other OSGi settings
right is not to us
24 matches
Mail list logo
