Camel.trunk.notest - Build # 2813 - Still Failing

2016-07-15 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.trunk.notest (build #2813) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2813/ to view the results.

[GitHub] camel pull request #1078: Allow to configure the SSL configuration of the lu...

2016-07-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1078 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[GitHub] camel pull request #1078: Allow to configure the SSL configuration of the lu...

2016-07-15 Thread adessaigne
GitHub user adessaigne opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1078 Allow to configure the SSL configuration of the lumberjack component at the component level You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/

[GitHub] camel pull request #1077: Fix lumberjack doc + Fix flaky test

2016-07-15 Thread adessaigne
Github user adessaigne closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1077 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [DISCUSS] Attachment Headers

2016-07-15 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks for bringing this up to attention. I read your proposals and very good with the pros/cons of them. Yeah I also think its better to go with #3 so we get a better solution for this which we carry forward for Camel 3, and have @deprecated the old api on 2.x. +1 for option #3. On Mon,

[GitHub] camel pull request #1077: Fix lumberjack doc + Fix flaky test

2016-07-15 Thread adessaigne
GitHub user adessaigne opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1077 Fix lumberjack doc + Fix flaky test You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/adessaigne/camel CAMEL-10133-2 Alternatively you can rev

[GitHub] camel pull request #1076: Component influxdb

2016-07-15 Thread jlpedrosa
Github user jlpedrosa closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1076 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

Re: camel git commit: Fixed Camel-Influxdb Karaf feature and added Karaf Integration test

2016-07-15 Thread Andrea Cosentino
Sure. -- Andrea Cosentino -- Apache Camel PMC Member Apache Karaf Committer Apache Servicemix Committer Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com Twitter: @oscerd2 Github: oscerd On Friday, July 15, 2016 9:56 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: Hi Remember to add integration test for S

Re: camel git commit: Fixed Camel-Influxdb Karaf feature and added Karaf Integration test

2016-07-15 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Remember to add integration test for SB also in tests/camel-itest-spring-boot On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:54 AM, wrote: > Repository: camel > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 6540a69cf -> 9e4cf3952 > > > Fixed Camel-Influxdb Karaf feature and added Karaf Integration test > > > Project:

[GitHub] camel pull request #1071: Add Lumberjack component

2016-07-15 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1071 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab