[GitHub] camel pull request #1200: CAMEL-10356 camel-metrics - Add support for gauge ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1200 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

Camel.trunk.notest - Build # 2897 - Still Failing

The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.trunk.notest (build #2897) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2897/ to view the results.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (non-binding), didn't make that clear in my original reply. On 6 October 2016 at 19:36, Jon Anstey wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Camel in Action v2 tests look good. > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > > > Running the Camel in Action tests against 2.18 now, will report back >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (binding) Camel in Action v2 tests look good. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: > Running the Camel in Action tests against 2.18 now, will report back soon. > Totally agree on that BOM import idea :-) > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Than

[GitHub] camel pull request #1200: CAMEL-10356 camel-metrics - Add support for gauge ...

GitHub user igarashitm opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1200 CAMEL-10356 camel-metrics - Add support for gauge type You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/igarashitm/camel CAMEL-10356 Alternat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (binding) Signature looks good. I checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files. Some LICENSE and NOTICE files were missing and I added these in trunk. I could build the binaries from apache-camel-2.18.0-src.zip. I also checked the dependencies of the newly added components and all are ok. Best, Christ

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (non-binding) Regards Krzysztof On 05.10.2016 16:54, Gregor Zurowski wrote: > Hi Everyone: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.18.0, the first release that > requires Java 8, comes with a much-improved Spring Boot support, and > ships with numerous new features and improvements. (For

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Hi David You can find the RC in the start of this mail thread. Its the staging repo url that Gregor posted. On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:35 AM, David Karlsen wrote: > Where is Rc repo? I can give it a spin on our products. Wiki is not up to > date AFAIK > > Den tor. 6. okt. 2016, 13:39 skrev Claus I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Where is Rc repo? I can give it a spin on our products. Wiki is not up to date AFAIK Den tor. 6. okt. 2016, 13:39 skrev Claus Ibsen : > Hi > > I am traveling all week and wont have much chance to test this until > sunday when I am back. > > However it would be good if anyone had the time to test

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Running the Camel in Action tests against 2.18 now, will report back soon. Totally agree on that BOM import idea :-) On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > Thanks, btw you may also need to update some other versions like > spring-boot to 1.4.1 and cxf, activemq, etc to use s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Hi Thanks, btw you may also need to update some other versions like spring-boot to 1.4.1 and cxf, activemq, etc to use similar versions as we are using in Camel 2.18.0. These versions are defined in the root pom.xml. PS: Yeah we should maybe do a BOM import instead of Camel 2.18.0 BOM so we use

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

I can do this later today. At present, im testing the RC build... Best, Christian Am 06.10.2016 1:39 nachm. schrieb "Claus Ibsen" : > Hi > > I am traveling all week and wont have much chance to test this until > sunday when I am back. > > However it would be good if anyone had the time to test t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

Hi I am traveling all week and wont have much chance to test this until sunday when I am back. However it would be good if anyone had the time to test the RC with the Camel in Action 2 source code: https://github.com/camelinaction/camelinaction2 You would need to update the Camel version in the

Re: camel-extra upgrade 2.18

Hi I'm on the camel-extra project. I gonna take a look asap. Regards JB On Oct 6, 2016, 13:12, at 13:12, fabryprog wrote: >Hello, > >More days ago, i sent more PRs into camel-extra project but i haven't >any >response. > >Do you known project's owners? > >thanks! > > > >-- >View this message

camel-extra upgrade 2.18

Hello, More days ago, i sent more PRs into camel-extra project but i haven't any response. Do you known project's owners? thanks! -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-extra-upgrade-2-18-tp5788435.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (binding) Regards JB On Oct 6, 2016, 11:06, at 11:06, Luca Burgazzoli wrote: >+1 (binding) > >--- >Luca Burgazzoli > > >On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Diesler >wrote: >> +1 (wildfly-camel ) >> >>> On 05 Oct 2016, at 16:54, Gregor Zur

[GitHub] camel pull request #1199: CAMEL-10358: do not clear the registry too early

GitHub user nicolaferraro opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1199 CAMEL-10358: do not clear the registry too early When running on Spring, the `doStop` is called by the spring framework before the default strategy unregisters the consumers, so the registry i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel 2.18.0

+1 (binding) --- Luca Burgazzoli On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Diesler wrote: > +1 (wildfly-camel ) > >> On 05 Oct 2016, at 16:54, Gregor Zurowski wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.18.0, the first