Camel.trunk.notest - Build # 2908 - Still Failing

2016-10-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.trunk.notest (build #2908) Status: Still Failing Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2908/ to view the results.

Re: Adding type awareness in Camel route

2016-10-17 Thread Tomohisa Igarashi
Hi, On 10/17/2016 03:32 PM, Siano, Stephan wrote: Hi, I am not sure if I really understand the concept behind this. Is there any text about the general ideas behind these changes? Good question, here is the original proposal my colleague made. "1) Extend the DSL" is what I implemented. http

[GitHub] camel pull request #1211: Camel 10327, New Apache drill component

2016-10-17 Thread Fabryprog
Github user Fabryprog closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1211 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

RE: [DISCUSS] HTTP session handling in Camel routes

2016-10-17 Thread Siano, Stephan
Hi Claus, OK, I will create a JIRA task for it and start working. As these are seven components to extend (and test), it might take a little time... Best regards Stephan -Original Message- From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com] Sent: Montag, 17. Oktober 2016 12:28 To: dev Su

Re: [DISCUSS] HTTP session handling in Camel routes

2016-10-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah that would work. The only downside is that camel-http-common has a dependency on the servlet API which not all the HTTP components are using. However its just one extra JAR on the classpath. On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Siano, Stephan wrote: > Hi Claus, > > Having the interface (an

RE: [DISCUSS] HTTP session handling in Camel routes

2016-10-17 Thread Siano, Stephan
Hi Claus, Having the interface (and implementations) in camel-http-common makes sense to me. This means that all the components below would have a dependency to camel-http-common. Does this make sense? I would implement the support for cookies in the producer endpoints for camel-ahc camel-cxf c

Re: [DISCUSS] HTTP session handling in Camel routes

2016-10-17 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I dont think cookie belongs in camel-core, and a better place is likely something like camel-http-common. And there are other http client components such as camel-nett4-http, camel-jetty, camel-undertow as well. And then for REST based there is camel-restlet and maybe camel-spark-rest. And for