GitHub user igarashitm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1216
CAMEL-10398 SJMS - Avoid NPE when neither of ConnectionResource nor Câ¦
â¦onnectionFactory is configured
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https:
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.trunk.notest (build #2909)
Status: Still Failing
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2909/
to view the results.
GitHub user igarashitm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1215
CAMEL-10397 SJMS - Raise an error against InOut+transacted producer aâ¦
â¦s it causes a deadlock
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github
No there is no such plan.
JMS is the best way to integrate Camel and Artemis or ActiveMQ.
You can also use AMQP or MQTT which they also support. But for Java
messaging then JMS is recommended.
activemq-camel is based on top of camel-jms but is just pre-configured
for ActiveMQ.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2
I posted this question on the ActiveMQ dev list, but I thought I’d ask the
Camel community as well.
I’d like to be able to use Artemis from Camel without using JMS - just interact
with the Artemis server via the core api. ActiveMQ has a activemq-camel
component - are there any plans for a simi
GitHub user igarashitm opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1214
CAMEL-9606 Share JMS session among SJMS endpoints to ensure transactiâ¦
â¦on atomicity
A testcase, which terminate a camel process during processing transacted
sjms consumer/producer.
Hi,
On 10/18/2016 10:31 PM, Siano, Stephan wrote:
Hi,
Well, you aim quite high.
So the idea is to annotate each endpoint with an input and an output data
format and then do the mapping between these types automatically via the type
converter registry. Did I get this right?
Yes that directi
Hi,
Well, you aim quite high.
So the idea is to annotate each endpoint with an input and an output data
format and then do the mapping between these types automatically via the type
converter registry. Did I get this right?
In this case it might be a useful feature, but I would guess it is pr
